Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
NOTAM 23/08
- eagle driver
- Posts: 14240
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:46 am
- Location: knaphill Surrey
- Contact:
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Anyone able to give any dates when 86-0124 was previously in the UK. TIA.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Just a reminder that any posts that don't add to the topic being discussed will be deleted without question and multiple postings that bare no relation to the topic won't go un-noticed.
Read a thread through chronologically and make sure, if you have a question, that it hasn't already been answered elsewhere. There's nothing more un-helpful to someone browsing the forum than having to sift through pages of chatter looking for info, its why I cleared up the topic last night.
The U-2 jokes were old 10 years ago too
Read a thread through chronologically and make sure, if you have a question, that it hasn't already been answered elsewhere. There's nothing more un-helpful to someone browsing the forum than having to sift through pages of chatter looking for info, its why I cleared up the topic last night.
The U-2 jokes were old 10 years ago too

Re: NOTAM 23/08
I have it down as departing Mildenhall on the 24th January 2009 along with 86-0109/DY if it helps.eagle driver wrote:Anyone able to give any dates when 86-0124 was previously in the UK. TIA.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Its only previous visit to Fairford was in Nov 2002 with 85-074/DY and 86-123/DY. Although it was assigned to the 7BW and flown by a 9BS crew it still wore the `GA` tail code of its former unit the 128BS Georgia ANG.eagle driver wrote:Anyone able to give any dates when 86-0124 was previously in the UK. TIA.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
I believe 86-0124 was the first B-1B to visit the UK when it appeared in the static of the Lakenheath Air Show on 27 August 1988. If my log is correct it was then operated by 384 BW.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:11 am
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Because my brain has a strong need for order, I am trying to resolve whether the U-2S 80-1083 with pod attached that arrived yesterday afternoon with callsign 86 was eastbound or westbound.
I believe that 083 arrived Fairford as DRAGN88 11-Jul-17 and departed as DRAGN53 12-Jul-17, which implies that it went east. I can't see any mention/photo of it with a pod on top, not that it's particularly relevant. Yesterday's 083 arrived in the afternoon from the north - according to someone at the airfield with a scanner - either as DRAGN86 (an 'eastbound' callsign consistent with a northerly arrival) or maybe the unusual FERRY86 callsign also mentioned.
Now although I may be influenced by seeing photos of 80-1076 flying at Beale two weeks ago with 077 on the nosewheel door into thinking mysterious thoughts, but surely if 083 went east a month ago, it should be arriving yesterday from the south, not the north? Unless it's been round the world.
I believe that 083 arrived Fairford as DRAGN88 11-Jul-17 and departed as DRAGN53 12-Jul-17, which implies that it went east. I can't see any mention/photo of it with a pod on top, not that it's particularly relevant. Yesterday's 083 arrived in the afternoon from the north - according to someone at the airfield with a scanner - either as DRAGN86 (an 'eastbound' callsign consistent with a northerly arrival) or maybe the unusual FERRY86 callsign also mentioned.
Now although I may be influenced by seeing photos of 80-1076 flying at Beale two weeks ago with 077 on the nosewheel door into thinking mysterious thoughts, but surely if 083 went east a month ago, it should be arriving yesterday from the south, not the north? Unless it's been round the world.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
80-1083 definitely arrived from the East yesterday as FERRY86.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
That's correct.plmc135 wrote:I believe 86-0124 was the first B-1B to visit the UK when it appeared in the static of the Lakenheath Air Show on 27 August 1988. If my log is correct it was then operated by 384 BW.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:11 am
Re: NOTAM 23/08
So 80-1083 if westbound, I guess that it came on a more northerly route, North Sea, rather than English Channel route, which explains why it was on Central frequencies (not South) and appeared to come from the North. Happy now!
Re: NOTAM 23/08
It came in as Ferry 86 from the north east , initially picked him up on 133.325 descending through 'FL650' (I posted on HU&OTT as he descended). I was at Fairford & it had the 'Span' fairing mounted . Maybe its a deployment rather than a swap .Could it have flown a mission 'en route' to Fairford from Akrotiri ?Cavemonster wrote:So 80-1083 if westbound, I guess that it came on a more northerly route, North Sea, rather than English Channel route, which explains why it was on Central frequencies (not South) and appeared to come from the North. Happy now!

-
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm
Re: NOTAM 23/08
You could phone the base and ask if it'd been on an operational mission and if it had where it'd flown? After all, it doesn't seem as though it was a regular ferry flight.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
I was trying to take this seriously by just interpreting the facts we have .
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Hi Guys,
Does anyone no were Rch345 Dep to Yesterday.........?
Many Thanks for any help
Does anyone no were Rch345 Dep to Yesterday.........?
Many Thanks for any help
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Thanks for the pointless postpage_verify wrote:You could phone the base and ask if it'd been on an operational mission and if it had where it'd flown? After all, it doesn't seem as though it was a regular ferry flight.
Re: NOTAM 23/08
Excellent idea Sam..SamP wrote:And with that I think we'll draw a line under this for now.
If you can keep your head whilst all around are losing theirs, you have probably completely misread the situation!!
Re: NOTAM 23/08
As far as I can tell from my end no ones touched any of your posts since atleast the 21st of the month.
So what exactly is it that's supposed to have happened?
So what exactly is it that's supposed to have happened?

Re: NOTAM 23/08
Why is this even still active? It only pertains to the 23rd it has no relevance to any other day at all!
Cheers
Mark
If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining
Mark
If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests