

Yes. Boats...airfixpilot wrote:Any comments on this?.
Disagree strongly with people trying to draw this conclusion.rdchawk wrote:Perhaps now Duxford will do a lot more than just those warning signs that everyone ignores and sort out physically stopping people from going in the naughty field or maybe the pilots being more forceful with Duxford and refusing to display if they're people in the area??
Indeed, ask Steve Johnson, Red Arrows, Brighton 1980EGVP wrote:Yes. Boats...
You are quite right, completely separate subject, and policing is the answer to that one. They'll be asking for Rhymes farm to be cordoned off next at RIATMalcolm wrote:Disagree strongly with people trying to draw this conclusion.rdchawk wrote:Perhaps now Duxford will do a lot more than just those warning signs that everyone ignores and sort out physically stopping people from going in the naughty field or maybe the pilots being more forceful with Duxford and refusing to display if they're people in the area??
People in the naughty field are there to watch/photograph the air-show. The people who have died on the A27 were just going about their daily lives and driving down the nearby road. The nearest comparison to your conclusion would be that the M11 is closed for the duration of the air-show. Obviously not going to happen. Focusing on people being where the air-show organisers would rather they weren't has nothing to do with this incident.
But the pilots have already voiced some concerns at Duxford already in regards to the field - so what I'm saying is would this incident lead to further concerns and possible no displays from pilots not happy with freeloaders in the field?? The display zone should have no public in it IF possible, Its possible for Duxford to get that field empty but it does mean dipping more into pockets and actually police it instead of wasting money on leaflets and posters that the freeloaders ignore anyway.Pune wrote:You are quite right, completely separate subject, and policing is the answer to that one. They'll be asking for Rhymes farm to be cordoned off next at RIATMalcolm wrote:Disagree strongly with people trying to draw this conclusion.rdchawk wrote:Perhaps now Duxford will do a lot more than just those warning signs that everyone ignores and sort out physically stopping people from going in the naughty field or maybe the pilots being more forceful with Duxford and refusing to display if they're people in the area??
People in the naughty field are there to watch/photograph the air-show. The people who have died on the A27 were just going about their daily lives and driving down the nearby road. The nearest comparison to your conclusion would be that the M11 is closed for the duration of the air-show. Obviously not going to happen. Focusing on people being where the air-show organisers would rather they weren't has nothing to do with this incident.
As it turns out, the people driving down the A27 were "in the display area/danger zone" on this occasion. In most air-show accidents, the pilots have very little input into where the aircraft is going to impact the ground once circumstances make that inevitable. Yes, if able they will do whatever they can to avoid what they can see in the final few seconds, but the by that stage the outcome is virtually sealed and their actions have very limited results. The Idea that they can 'chose' where to crash is a fallacy in my view.rdchawk wrote:But my point is that the people in the naughty field are "in the display area/danger zone" And thus in the firing line if something did happen, But because they're holding a camera it makes it ok? Is that what you're saying?
The nearby annual Brighton airshow used to be performed over the sea until a Red Arrows pilot ejected and his Hawk went unsupervised into a roll over the pier and landed in the sea just off the beach, which was packed full of spectators, including me.airfixpilot wrote:Hi rdchawk, I agree with you on crowd lines at airshows, and fools who cross them, but this accident was outside the perimeter. One thing the news are saying is having airshows over the sea (at seasides). Any comments on this?.
Crowd rear arrivals haven't been permitted for many, many years - I'm not certain but think it may have been outlawed in the review of safety after the 1988 Ramstein disaster. The Red Arrows did have an exemption for a while I believe, but I think that's also been revoked.rdchawk wrote:I wonder if this now spells the end of crowd rear arrivals?? minimise all flying over the public.
It hasn't been revoked, either that or they arrived 'illegally' from crowd rear at both Duxford and RIAT this year and many years previously.Malcolm wrote:Crowd rear arrivals haven't been permitted for many, many years - I'm not certain but think it may have been outlawed in the review of safety after the 1988 Ramstein disaster. The Red Arrows did have an exemption for a while I believe, but I think that's also been revoked.rdchawk wrote:I wonder if this now spells the end of crowd rear arrivals?? minimise all flying over the public.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests