Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

C130 "Snoopy"

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
Doughnut
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by Doughnut » Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:58 pm

lowlevel wrote:Instead of the scrapman getting hold of her,why don't Duxford Museum display her.

1)
Because Duxford will not pay to buy the aircraft from the MOD, when the MOD can and remove any usefull spares and be paid a (small) sum for the scrap weight of what is left.

2) Duxford has no space to display it under cover.

3) Why does Duxford want an unrepresentive 'test' airframe, surely better to wait and hope to receive a 'standard' model when the time comes.

It is a shame that national collections do not have a 'hit list' of significant airframes, not just aircraft types. For the Hercules XV196 or XV200 are both still current and sould be preserved. Why ? XV200 was the first C-1P converted by Marshalls, in double quick time, to have a probe for in flight refuelling, a vital requirement in resupply during the Falklands in April 1982, XV196 is the only other surviver of the six aircraft used in the South Atlantic.

User avatar
PR9
Posts: 840
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 8:38 pm
Location: South Yorkshire

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by PR9 » Wed Jan 06, 2010 11:51 pm

Would have thought if anywhere Snoopy would be more at home either at Boscombe Museum or Cosford with the other modified or "test" airframes.
I was lucky enough to see her in the flesh as "Snoopy" a couple of years ago at RIAT. Pretty funky looking machine with the Met gear on.
MISSING - x1 Air Force.
If found please return to the UK.

User avatar
teeonefixer
Posts: 925
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 10:39 pm
Location: East Yorkshire

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by teeonefixer » Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:03 am

It's a shame but we have to be practical with preservation and concentrate on preserving properly the most relevant specimens. XV208 is more valuable as a source of parts I'm afraid. I heard that the RAF Andovers were not cost-effective to return to service only after a few years in store, as updating the essential mods equivalent to the last ones in service was prohibitive. This would be even more difficult for XV208.
I have a spot for this aeroplane. In the very early part of my career I was involved in ordering and fitting the improved Urinal mod at the RAE, then had the chance to flight test this mod a few years laterwhen doing some trials at Marshalls. It's not all glamour in the world of aviation !

Sheff

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by Sheff » Fri Jan 08, 2010 1:00 am

Why does Duxford want an unrepresentive 'test' airframe

Indeed, Duxford is probably the last place I'd want to send the aircraft. Look what happened to the magnificent Varsity (which 208 directly replaced with the MRF)... sat there for a few years, chugged along the runway a few times, then it was abandoned and left to slowly rot until Duxford decided that they didn't want it any longer (presumably they wanted more space for some more Spitfires). Okay, Duxford are obviously entitled to take the view that the aircraft was duplicated by the DAS Varsity also located there (not that they've exactly showered attention on that airframe either), but it really is a disgrace that a unique research aircraft is supposedly accepted for preservation only to be dumped when someone comes along who evidently isn't interested in it. Seems to be the case at some of our museums that some aircraft only survive depending on the personal tastes of those in control - it's no way to handle aircraft preservation.

It's probably just as well that Snoopy hasn't gone to Duxford as it would doubtless go the same way as the Varsity once Duxford got bored with it. It is a shame that it isn't being preserved though. One would assume that when Marshalls have removed anything of any great value, it would be suitable for museum allocation but I imagine the problem is that museums either don't want it, or couldn't afford to have it transported and assembled? Shame that it can't go back to Boscombe Down and be left there - it's not as if they're short of space!

lrv890
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:17 pm
Location: Bedfordshire
Contact:

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by lrv890 » Sat May 11, 2013 4:06 pm

Here's a quick update on Snoopy , as many of you know it was used as a testbed for the A400m engine , it now sits rather sad and unloved near the control tower . What will be it future , time will tell !!!

Image
C130 "Snoopy" by lr v8 90, on Flickr

User avatar
Tim Holden
Posts: 348
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:56 pm

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by Tim Holden » Sat May 11, 2013 4:26 pm

She it sitting on the ramp next to the tower devoid of engines. She is not going anywhere soon.

User avatar
hydealfred
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:24 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by hydealfred » Sat May 11, 2013 6:08 pm

Seen in happier times at an 80's airshow -

Image
Richard Hall
http://www.airshowspresent.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.xs420.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Supra
Posts: 2869
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by Supra » Sat May 11, 2013 9:12 pm

Anybody know the significance of the 'red nose' (11th May 2013 picture)... aside from the obvious backdrop to some scatty fund-raising? The retro black radome (fitted for flight when the 'barbers pole' empennage got chopped!) seems to be on ground below the test-engine location.

lrv890
Posts: 205
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:17 pm
Location: Bedfordshire
Contact:

Re: C130 "Snoopy"

Post by lrv890 » Sat May 11, 2013 9:55 pm

Hi I don't think the black thing is the dome in this photo it looks more like another nose cone to me

Image
C130 "Snoopy" by lr v8 90, on Flickr

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: B787driver, Captain Lockheed, mudhen15 and 29 guests