Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Airtanker operations

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
Post Reply
User avatar
StuBie
Posts: 1916
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Everywhere

Airtanker operations

Post by StuBie » Fri Apr 25, 2025 2:19 pm

Hi All,

What is the current operational standing when it comes to Airtanker airframes? Having seen in the last few weeks a number of charters taking the place of the airtanker aircraft on their regular routes I was confused as to why Airtanker would have leased out an airframe to Jet2?

From my understanding:
> G-VYGM operating for Jet2 since 08/04
> G-VYGK operating the South Atlantic airbridge
> G-VYGJ last landed at Brize 18/02 according to FR24 (on maintenance?)

Without getting too political with regards to PFI's and previous governments I'm surprised that given the apparent capacity shortfall here that Jet2 would get priority, unless it is part of the overall airtanker contract.

Cheers,

Stu
BECAUSE TYPING IN LOWER CASE WOULD BE EASY.............

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by POL » Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:49 pm

What shortfall?

Al dunn
Posts: 4161
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:12 pm
Location: MOD St Athan

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Al dunn » Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:16 pm

G-VYGJ is in the Air Tanker Hangar at Brize rumoured to be very broken

Neil D
Posts: 537
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 8:09 am

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Neil D » Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:23 pm

Al dunn wrote:
Fri Apr 25, 2025 8:16 pm
G-VYGJ is in the Air Tanker Hangar at Brize rumoured to be very broken
It's outside Al, tail on to the viewing by Britannia gate.

Neil

User avatar
StuBie
Posts: 1916
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by StuBie » Fri Apr 25, 2025 10:03 pm

POL wrote:
Fri Apr 25, 2025 4:49 pm
What shortfall?
Ok, maybe a wrong term of phrase. Given that we're now using external charters to cover regular operational routes while the airframe we were using is now carrying holiday makers feels a bit out of place.

Stu
BECAUSE TYPING IN LOWER CASE WOULD BE EASY.............

Philwinward
Posts: 375
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 12:05 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Philwinward » Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:00 am

If you think about it, Voyager is now only used in its refueling role for Typhoon and F35. It can’t refuel any of our “heavies” (except A400 ?) because it is not boom equipped.
For all the big stuff ( RC135, C17, P8, E7) we have to use USAF tankers.
The way the Fighter Force is going each squadron will soon be able to have its own permanently allocated tanker!

Doughnut
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Doughnut » Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:35 am

If MOD trooping flights are using chartered airlines it is possible that Airtanker are covering the cost. In this crazy world probably cheaper to use the charter than run their own A330's

NorvilleRogers
Posts: 362
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:03 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by NorvilleRogers » Sat Apr 26, 2025 8:09 am

Were the 4 used as passenger transports ever converted to MRTT spec or do they remain pure A330-200?

mirage 2000
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:05 pm
Location: Manchester

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by mirage 2000 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 8:20 am

Jet2 usally have two A330's for there summer schedule. I think this year it will be three from air tanker as iam pretty sure there will be two flying from Manchester (one is currently) and there basing another from Birmingham.

User avatar
Scuba 11
Posts: 898
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:54 pm
Location: EGVN

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Scuba 11 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 9:20 am

NorvilleRogers wrote:
Sat Apr 26, 2025 8:09 am
Were the 4 used as passenger transports ever converted to MRTT spec or do they remain pure A330-200?
All 14 Aircraft have been converted, and all have the ability to be turned back into Tankers.

User avatar
Scuba 11
Posts: 898
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:54 pm
Location: EGVN

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Scuba 11 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 9:22 am

Doughnut wrote:
Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:35 am
If MOD trooping flights are using chartered airlines it is possible that Airtanker are covering the cost. In this crazy world probably cheaper to use the charter than run their own A330's
If MOD has the requirment outside of the contracted AirTanker aircraft, then MOD pay for the additional charters.

Unknown74
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:13 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Unknown74 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 11:26 am

Sorry I know I shouldn't ask this but what has happened with ZZ336 - Vespina? Haven't heard of or seen it about for a while?

User avatar
AlexLee05
Posts: 284
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2023 2:46 pm
Location: Brecon Beacons

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by AlexLee05 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 11:39 am

ZZ336 is in for long term maintenance at Brize, in pieces from what I've heard

Unknown74
Posts: 4150
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:13 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Unknown74 » Sat Apr 26, 2025 11:51 am

Ah ok cheerz for that AlexLee05......

Wyvern
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed May 22, 2024 12:28 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by Wyvern » Tue Apr 29, 2025 3:40 pm

Interesting G-VYGM flew out of Manchester to Prestwick this afternoon using the call sign call sign TOW755.
Operator listed as Air Tanker not Jet2.

User avatar
StuBie
Posts: 1916
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:09 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by StuBie » Tue Apr 29, 2025 8:21 pm

Wyvern wrote:
Tue Apr 29, 2025 3:40 pm
Interesting G-VYGM flew out of Manchester to Prestwick this afternoon using the call sign call sign TOW755.
Operator listed as Air Tanker not Jet2.
It looks like a flight training. Departed as TOW755 to Prestwick and then conducted 2 lots of circuits before then returning to Manchester as TOW712 at 19:00.

Stu
BECAUSE TYPING IN LOWER CASE WOULD BE EASY.............

pg1610
Posts: 2657
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 3:32 pm

Re: Airtanker operations

Post by pg1610 » Tue Apr 29, 2025 8:40 pm

Philwinward wrote:
Sat Apr 26, 2025 7:00 am
If you think about it, Voyager is now only used in its refueling role for Typhoon and F35. It can’t refuel any of our “heavies” (except A400 ?) because it is not boom equipped.
For all the big stuff ( RC135, C17, P8, E7) we have to use USAF tankers.
The way the Fighter Force is going each squadron will soon be able to have its own permanently allocated tanker!
Do any of the C17/P8 missions use AAR ?
Phil

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cargomaster133uk, Majestic-12 [Bot], Stellaproblem and 45 guests