Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Chancellor statement

A place to chat and discuss everything and anything thats NOT Military Aviation related. No Civilian Aviation content please. We would be grateful for such inclusions on our sister site - Civilian Aviation.
slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57778
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by slogen51 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:37 pm

iainpeden wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:01 pm
slogen51 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 5:15 pm
Reeves also confirmed the government has made a 22% two-year pay offer to junior doctors. Teachers and NHS workers will also get a 5.5% rise

Interesting how she differentiates between doctors and NHS workers - most people you will see or will be of actual help will be a 'NHS worker' rather than a doctor

Don't get me started on teachers :)
You knew darn well that that was going to be a red rag to me!

If the amount saved by limiting the winter fuel payment is going towards stopping young doctors completing their (very expensive to us) training and then emigrating to the former colonies down under or goes towards meeting the major teacher shortage the country is facing then it's worth the "sacrifice". After all I was going to spend mine on the lift pass for my second ski holiday next March - and I suspect the honourable member for Mundford would use his to part fund a trip abroad to watch aeroplanes!

Maybe it's an East Anglian thing but the Truss budget, the billions that Hancock paid out unnecessarily (that should save me from a libel allegation) on unusable PPE or the Johnson parties in No.10 while the rest of us were imprisoned at home is seemingly forgotten on here. The country is broke - and that didn't just happen in the last three weeks - and needs to be paid for.
I was thinking of my neighbours - i don't even know you?

Just say why you agree with the decision rather picking apart what others post

User avatar
James Cutting
Posts: 5015
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by James Cutting » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:39 pm

Why do you take everything so personal Mike? You make a thread to disucss it, people raise legitimate points without getting that personal and you get your back up and on the defensive??

Are you going to PM someone else to tell them they are toxic to the community??
"Grim Reapers Supporter"

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/99536938@N06/

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57778
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by slogen51 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:41 pm

Why can't you just post about the subject and add some information or correct something rather than commenting on what I or others have posted?

What have my spotting trips got to do with my friend who are struggling on a pension.

atech
Posts: 243
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 4:44 pm
Location: Worcester

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by atech » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:44 pm

The country is broke - and that didn't just happen in the last three weeks - and needs to be paid for.
Yes the country is broke, but mainly because for nearly two years we paid a lot of the population 80% of their salary to sit at home and do s*d all, seriously egged on by one Mr Captain Hindsight Starmer because we were not spending enough and moving into lockdown fast enough. That also needs to be remembered.

Yes it doe need to be paid for, by doctors, teachers, public/private sector workers et al, and not leave it to those people who have little chance of increasing their income to shoulder the burden.

At the beginning of this century I listened to labour’s one Mr Gordon Brown telling us we are not saving enough for our old age. So I worked hard, saved and thought I could have a comfortable retirement. Now after over a half century of work, the same party’s chancellor wants to take take it all away from me.

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1776
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by XWP29 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:49 pm

I’m thinking of all those who can’t even afford gloves who get frozen fingers at Lakenheath. :whistle:

Seriously, we now know who’s in the frame, Rachel R showing her true intents.
Cutting winter fuel payments is Dickensian, add in the
Edstone eco nut who’s going to make everything electric, goodness help the pensioners who won’t qualify, but will be turning off the heating this winter.

Wait till October…..

User avatar
Ghostrider01
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:16 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by Ghostrider01 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:50 pm

If you all think that 22% for junior doctors is er, bad, then let's just wait to see what our illustrious MP's choose to bump their 'salaries' by !!

While on the subject of them (the mp's), how much correlation is there with the 'benefit cheats' .. probably quite a bit.

My Mrs works for the NHS .. she can't wait now to leap that massive amount up .. over the minimum wage !

User avatar
James Cutting
Posts: 5015
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by James Cutting » Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:52 pm

Restricting winter fuel allowance (as it is just a restriction) is simply not going to fund the AVERAGE 22% pay rise for doctors (as it isn't just a straight 22% raise).

Multiple things were cancelled or scrapped - Rwanda will save millions. £500million saved after the Tories wanted to bring back rural railway lines from the 60s and 70s. A tunnel under Stonehenge will be scrapped.

And to be frank - you want the NHS to be paid well when everyone gets the care they need. (Easy what you find when you spend a mo reading the BBC report :) )
"Grim Reapers Supporter"

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/99536938@N06/

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1776
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by XWP29 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:02 pm

James Cutting wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:52 pm
Restricting winter fuel allowance (as it is just a restriction) is simply not going to fund the AVERAGE 22% pay rise for doctors (as it isn't just a straight 22% raise).

Multiple things were cancelled or scrapped - Rwanda will save millions. £500million saved after the Tories wanted to bring back rural railway lines from the 60s and 70s. A tunnel under Stonehenge will be scrapped.

And to be frank - you want the NHS to be paid well when everyone gets the care they need. (Easy what you find when you spend a mo reading the BBC report :) )
As you know James I love Railways and bringing them back would help reduce car use. As long as they are steam locomotives that’s fine.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57778
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by slogen51 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:02 pm

I personally think taking money from pensioners to ' balance the books ' should be a last resort not in the summer statement

We will never know but I wonder what the Tories had in mind

I think I was shocked or surprised at the decision because it seems so un labour

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1776
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by XWP29 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:04 pm

Stopping Doctors leaving is key as is NHS workers. Totally happy to support that one.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57778
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by slogen51 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:07 pm

The Rwanda money has been spent - i thought I read in the media we are not getting the money back?

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1776
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by XWP29 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:11 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:02 pm
I personally think taking money from pensioners to ' balance the books ' should be a last resort not in the summer statement

We will never know but I wonder what the Tories had in mind

I think I was shocked or surprised at the decision because it seems so un labour
I’m surprised you’re surprised, Gordon Clown (sic), raided pension plans by taking away tax relief from pension funds. They’re hitting what they see as pensioners with too much.

User avatar
Blackcat1
Posts: 26276
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:06 pm
Location: Southern edge of the Brecon Beacons, South Wales

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by Blackcat1 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:13 pm

Pensioners with too much , absolute bollocks
Gareth

6 Sqdn Canopeners
Oculi exercitus
Blackcats remembered
Jaguar Force Excellance! 2nd July 07.

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1776
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by XWP29 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:13 pm

Blackcat1 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:13 pm
Pensioners with too much , absolute bollocks
What they see

User avatar
Blackcat1
Posts: 26276
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:06 pm
Location: Southern edge of the Brecon Beacons, South Wales

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by Blackcat1 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:14 pm

XWP29 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:13 pm
Blackcat1 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:13 pm
Pensioners with too much , absolute bollocks
What they see
Yes I know I was referring to “what they see” 😊
Gareth

6 Sqdn Canopeners
Oculi exercitus
Blackcats remembered
Jaguar Force Excellance! 2nd July 07.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57778
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by slogen51 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:19 pm

I suppose it is close to my heart ( not as James Cutting hilariously inferred because I can't go spotting anymore) but because, and obviously i am not alone in this, I have several friends who will be effected by this.

In fact it was brought to my attention by a lady friend who is single and although gets by with a lot of class and dignity will now have to be even more careful - she can cope of course she can but I just think it's unfair - quite harsh

I fully accept budgets need to be balanced but hitting pensioners is too easy and a cheap shot

User avatar
James Cutting
Posts: 5015
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by James Cutting » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:23 pm

In breach of Rule 4, no?

Tells off someone else for doing it, then as a Mod, does it himself? Just as everything was back civilised. :)
"Grim Reapers Supporter"

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/99536938@N06/

raptor9
Posts: 1798
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 10:52 am

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by raptor9 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:36 pm

Happy with loosing the fuel allowance. I regard it as 'doing my bit' to try to get the country on it's feet, though I am well aware that a large number of people are going to be affected by this. Ah well, I get free electricity [solar panels].

User avatar
C24
Posts: 3374
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:52 am
Location: In the 51st State of the Union

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by C24 » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:38 pm

James Cutting wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:23 pm
In breach of Rule 4, no?

Tells off someone else for doing it, then as a Mod, does it himself? Just as everything was back civilised. :)
The thought crossed my mind too
Last edited by C24 on Thu Aug 01, 2024 7:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
C24.
493d/48th - Grim Reapers Supporter.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/charlie-two-four/ FuzzyFastjetFotos, incorporating "HazyHelos"
There's no "go-round" in a glider.

iainpeden
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 7:20 pm

Re: Chancellor statement

Post by iainpeden » Mon Jul 29, 2024 7:55 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:37 pm

Just say why you agree with the decision rather picking apart what others post
First, the Tories have all but bankrupted the country with 99.5% borrowing to GDP and that needs to be paid for; not by some Truss magic money tree but by people.

Second reason revolves around my personal finances. Having been a teacher and headteacher for 38 years I have a comfortable pension - not non-contributary. last November I turned 66 and became eligible for my state pension. Over my working life (the only time I claimed unemployment benefit was in my first summer as a student) I was careful with money using a number of savings plans over 10, 20 and 25 years to build up a savings pot (the most I paid into one was £21 a month). Then my parents died within 20 months of each other - neither needing any care packages and owning their own house - so that money was shared between my sister and me. When my daughter was born we stuck to UK holidays once a year; neither my wife and I smoke, we tended to eat out once a fortnight at the local pub but did indulge in newish cars every few years. So by being careful, saving a bit, sticking with a demanding job and realising the value of my pension early on I am comfortably off.

There are plenty of people like me to whom that winter payment was just a bonus so that's why I agree with it. While I know there are people who haven't had the benefit of those breaks it has always seem a bit anachronistic that this was a benefit which was not linked to need.

With regard to the lady you mention - don't forget that we pensioners still have the advantage of the triple lock.

Locked

Return to “General Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blakey and 22 guests