Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
User avatar
F4JPhantomII
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:08 pm
Location: Suffolk

2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by F4JPhantomII » Thu Mar 31, 2022 5:26 pm

Read this in the April 2022 copy of Air Forces Monthly:
Reports suggest the base [RAF Mildenhall] has commenced plans to expand, with the possibility of the 100th ARW forming a second squadron with an increased number of KC-135s.
Is anyone aware of said reports?

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 57773
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by slogen51 » Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:07 pm

I have heard chat about this - wondered if that's from where Lager / Quid are based on?

quid21
Posts: 920
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Newmarket

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by quid21 » Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:19 pm

Shouldn't they start upgrading to the KC-46?

User avatar
Thunderbolt II
Posts: 1066
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 7:40 am

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Thunderbolt II » Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:23 pm

Not an upgrade, by all accounts....

quid21
Posts: 920
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:36 pm
Location: Newmarket

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by quid21 » Thu Mar 31, 2022 9:27 pm

Thunderbolt II wrote:
Thu Mar 31, 2022 6:23 pm
Not an upgrade, by all accounts....
I was being polite to the old gal :D

User avatar
plmc135
Posts: 3486
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: South Holland

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by plmc135 » Fri Apr 01, 2022 6:05 am

Does AFM = April Fools Month? :thumbs:

Doughnut
Posts: 1254
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Doughnut » Fri Apr 01, 2022 8:26 am

If you assume this plan is due to the current Ukraine situation would a rolling TDY of ANG tankers not suffice ?

Seahornet1
Posts: 584
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Severn valley, South Shropshire

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Seahornet1 » Fri Apr 01, 2022 9:48 am

Doughnut wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 8:26 am
If you assume this plan is due to the current Ukraine situation would a rolling TDY of ANG tankers not suffice ?
Maybe it acknowledges the fact that, even when the fighting stops, the tension will continue for years, perhaps decades to come...? :unsure:

User avatar
BOLLO
Posts: 102808
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Nottingham/Mildenhall.

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by BOLLO » Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:43 am

Seen a patch with 341ARS "CRY HAVOC" knocking about .
http://www.airfighters.com/photosearch.php?phgid=SHED" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; LOADES
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last

What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???

Yorky
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:00 pm

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Yorky » Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:49 am

I did hear of this last year but as nothing further was heard i thought it had been cancelled so pehaps not.

User avatar
DanBeeden
Posts: 2083
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 1:10 pm
Location: Short finals

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by DanBeeden » Fri Apr 01, 2022 3:12 pm

I was wondering just recently if this would happen, though hadn't seen anything online about it, as it occurred to me that the 100th could not maintain this kind of sortie tempo indefinitely. Perhaps there isn't the capacity in ANG units to support a continual detachment at the Hall (though seeing Ohio and Michigan KC-135s lined up opposite Folly Road would be pretty neat!)?

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by page_verify » Fri Apr 01, 2022 4:32 pm

ARS or EARS? Big difference.

User avatar
F4JPhantomII
Posts: 302
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 5:08 pm
Location: Suffolk

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by F4JPhantomII » Fri Apr 01, 2022 4:44 pm

BOLLO wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:43 am
Seen a patch with 341ARS "CRY HAVOC" knocking about .
Was it this one? https://www.ramaworld.com/air-force-raf ... 0&limit=15

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by page_verify » Fri Apr 01, 2022 5:14 pm

F4JPhantomII wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 4:44 pm
BOLLO wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:43 am
Seen a patch with 341ARS "CRY HAVOC" knocking about .
Was it this one? https://www.ramaworld.com/air-force-raf ... 0&limit=15
Looks pretty conclusive.

Snoop 95
Posts: 2053
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: West Suffolk

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Snoop 95 » Fri Apr 01, 2022 6:10 pm

In addition to the current situation regarding the Ukraine it seems that there will be a significant increase in demand for boom IFR as many of the US made aircraft on order or in service with European NATO allies are only refuellable by this method. E.g. P8, F35A and RC135. I was interested to see that Boeing have been trialling an IFR drone and refuelling an F35C : https://www.aero-mag.com/mq-25-refuelling-f-35-14092021
A sign of the future for IFR I suppose.

User avatar
BOLLO
Posts: 102808
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Nottingham/Mildenhall.

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by BOLLO » Fri Apr 01, 2022 8:06 pm

F4JPhantomII wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 4:44 pm
BOLLO wrote:
Fri Apr 01, 2022 11:43 am
Seen a patch with 341ARS "CRY HAVOC" knocking about .
Was it this one? https://www.ramaworld.com/air-force-raf ... 0&limit=15
Thats the one fella :thumb:
http://www.airfighters.com/photosearch.php?phgid=SHED" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; LOADES
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last

What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???

User avatar
Finty
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:00 pm
Location: Brum loop

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Finty » Sat Apr 02, 2022 10:25 pm

I’d read about the 349th being a potential candidate, coincidentally also once part of the 100th bomber group but nothing confirmed.
"Genny from the Bwlch"

352nd Supporter/ F35 Supporter/ Valkyries supporter

User avatar
f106dart
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:20 am

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by f106dart » Sun Apr 03, 2022 12:18 am

Finty wrote:
Sat Apr 02, 2022 10:25 pm
I’d read about the 349th being a potential candidate, coincidentally also once part of the 100th bomber group but nothing confirmed.
In the new AF standards they go by the unit who has the most history and combat actions. But one would think that any unit in the 100th would fit this criteria. As for RAMA world they have been know to make remakes repros but don't acknowledge that. Hence there making the RAFL crown patches for the top 3 to make some cash. Nor are those patches that there selling worn by the squadrons that they are making. The real crown patches are made somewhere else.

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by page_verify » Sun Apr 03, 2022 7:44 am

As Rama don't sell less than 25 patches per order I'm leaning towards thinking they often make their own versions of existing official patches because the primary supplier is out of materials or time, they've put their prices up, or someone's just joined the squadron who know can get a better deal. Some of those four reasons have happened in the last year for the 99th ERS which is why there's several versions of their crest. Nonetheless, I struggle to believe that Rama would randomly have a 341st design and randomly start offering it for sale.

Does anyone have any thoughts about where the 100th's second ARS might be based? My thinking is Germany.

Reach1985
Posts: 506
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:01 pm
Location: Norwich

Re: 2nd Sqn for 100th ARW? - AFM

Post by Reach1985 » Sun Apr 03, 2022 9:47 am

If this is to happen - which I think is a distinct possibility then as a guess I’d say the main operating base will be Mildenhall but w/ aircraft forward deployed as they are at the current time to where ever needs them. Eg. Ramstein, Moron etc. I believe MH is able to deliver the maintenance etc. (to what depth I don’t know) for -135 aircraft so I don’t see there being a permanent base as such away from MH but maybe a detachment or 2 somewhere 100ARW det.1 etc.

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 747flyer, Bing [Bot], Leardriver, Rubberneck and 130 guests