Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Please post movements and activities to do with RAF Fairford here
bobthehandyman
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by bobthehandyman » Wed May 31, 2017 11:51 am

StormsInAfrica wrote:All B-2 equipment arrived into Mildenhall before being taken to Fairford by road. Aircrew arrived on civvy flights into Heathrow. :ninja:
hi, im gonna ask a question, and I have no reason to doubt your info, my question is why? the USAF do some strange things, maybe deploying to a site where they need to move everything and everybody by road is part of the exercise, but if its not, why fly equipment and personal to other airfields when Fiarrford would be much easier? As a say, I have no reason to doubt your info, and I don't, just curious.

jamesg23
Posts: 934
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: Waddington

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by jamesg23 » Wed May 31, 2017 12:02 pm

Possibly because they know we can track the flights in and out so to keep it low profile the do it this way.

bobthehandyman
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by bobthehandyman » Wed May 31, 2017 12:05 pm

jamesg23 wrote:Possibly because they know we can track the flights in and out so to keep it low profile the do it this way.
That possibility did cross my mind, it just seems to simple as the amount of civvie staff involved would make keeping a low profile almost impossible...but it could be that simple.

martmpf
Posts: 1569
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:27 pm
Location: Grimsby

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by martmpf » Wed May 31, 2017 12:11 pm

Could also be that the kit came in as a small part of a load destined for the 'hall and possibly on multiple flights. Just a guess!

User avatar
Gary
Administrator
Posts: 41876
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:51 pm
Location: South Lincolnshire

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by Gary » Thu Jun 01, 2017 3:58 am

Tracking thread for the arrival has been set up. Please post tracking info in that thread only

viewtopic.php?f=8&p=903093#p903093
Posh BSM Trophy winners 2024

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by page_verify » Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:40 am

bobthehandyman wrote:
StormsInAfrica wrote:All B-2 equipment arrived into Mildenhall before being taken to Fairford by road. Aircrew arrived on civvy flights into Heathrow. :ninja:
hi, im gonna ask a question, and I have no reason to doubt your info, my question is why? the USAF do some strange things, maybe deploying to a site where they need to move everything and everybody by road is part of the exercise, but if its not, why fly equipment and personal to other airfields when Fiarrford would be much easier? As a say, I have no reason to doubt your info, and I don't, just curious.
The reason will almost certainly be because it's cheaper, in fact I can't think of another reason. It'll purely be down to cost. How often do you see passenger or cargo flights for other "flying visitors" to the base?

POL
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by POL » Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:42 am

And if the complement of crew is small - 10/15/etc. then shoving them in economy on a United flight makes infinitely more sense.

User avatar
bizfreeq
Posts: 2941
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth UK

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by bizfreeq » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:07 am

Kc135 on a touch and go
Cheers
Mark



If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by page_verify » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:09 am

Quid 42,T&G, more details in the UK section.

User avatar
SamP
Administrator
Posts: 6738
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Near Gatwick Airport, UK

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by SamP » Thu Jun 01, 2017 11:29 am

MYTEE96 Arr 12:20L B-52H 61-0020/LA Bl 20th BS Markings

User avatar
big john
Posts: 7438
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:53 am
Location: EGLL

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by big john » Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:24 pm

Any visual confirmation of serial for Mytee 51?
rgds
BJ
Always Watching: Always Listening
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

TomG
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:33 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by TomG » Thu Jun 01, 2017 4:39 pm

big john wrote:Any visual confirmation of serial for Mytee 51?
60-0002/LA (gr) 2 BW spcl mks & "Let's Roll" mks on Stbd nose. Didn't catch what the nose art on the port side was.

Tom

bobthehandyman
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 4:29 pm
Location: Trowbridge, Wiltshire

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by bobthehandyman » Thu Jun 01, 2017 5:01 pm

page_verify wrote:
bobthehandyman wrote:
StormsInAfrica wrote:All B-2 equipment arrived into Mildenhall before being taken to Fairford by road. Aircrew arrived on civvy flights into Heathrow. :ninja:
hi, im gonna ask a question, and I have no reason to doubt your info, my question is why? the USAF do some strange things, maybe deploying to a site where they need to move everything and everybody by road is part of the exercise, but if its not, why fly equipment and personal to other airfields when Fiarrford would be much easier? As a say, I have no reason to doubt your info, and I don't, just curious.
The reason will almost certainly be because it's cheaper, in fact I can't think of another reason. It'll purely be down to cost. How often do you see passenger or cargo flights for other "flying visitors" to the base?
hi
You could be right, on the cost front, but there was a C-5 and I understand a commercial charter into Fairford last week, there must be numerous C-5, C-17, KC-10 and KC-135 flights crossing the pond every day, I would have thought these would have offered lower costs, as you say cost would seem to be a logical reason, thanks for the response..

page_verify
Posts: 1640
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:19 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by page_verify » Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:07 pm

Hi Bob,

There's a lot of complex reasons why units charter airliners, and send cargo and people commercial. Essentially, the USAF doesn't have any passenger aircraft and the priority is usually to always use cargo aircraft to ship cargo rather than people due to the safety requirements carrying passengers these days. Its logistics world was never designed or resourced to transport small amounts of people or cargo, so getting all of the cargo to the same place for an onward journey can cost as much and take as long as the onward flight. Also the way inidividual units pay for transport of people or cargo doesn't normally make it worth them sharing another unit's flights. There's other reasons too but PM me if you're interested rather than have me clog up this forum any more :)

User avatar
big john
Posts: 7438
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:53 am
Location: EGLL

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by big john » Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:53 pm

TomG wrote: 60-0002/LA (gr) 2 BW spcl mks & "Let's Roll" mks on Stbd nose. Didn't catch what the nose art on the port side was.
Tom
Thanks Tom saved me a trip. :( Hopefully they'll break one and send a decent one over. :roll:
rgds
BJ
Always Watching: Always Listening
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

User avatar
Cornish-guy
Posts: 2429
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:57 am

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by Cornish-guy » Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:26 pm

big john wrote:
TomG wrote: 60-0002/LA (gr) 2 BW spcl mks & "Let's Roll" mks on Stbd nose. Didn't catch what the nose art on the port side was.
Tom
Thanks Tom saved me a trip. :( Hopefully they'll break one and send a decent one over. :roll:

How about another four and four B-1's :D


C.
Nikon D7100, Nikkor 300 f4 IF ED :-)

DEREK SMITH
Posts: 149
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 1:59 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by DEREK SMITH » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:08 pm

Hi So when did 60-0002 visit the UK

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 49404
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by slogen51 » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:09 pm

big john wrote:
TomG wrote: 60-0002/LA (gr) 2 BW spcl mks & "Let's Roll" mks on Stbd nose. Didn't catch what the nose art on the port side was.
Tom
Thanks Tom saved me a trip. :( Hopefully they'll break one and send a decent one over. :roll:

60-0002 is a decent one for me :P

User avatar
bizfreeq
Posts: 2941
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 8:08 pm
Location: Bournemouth UK

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by bizfreeq » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:14 pm

DEREK SMITH wrote:Hi So when did 60-0002 visit the UK
Who says it has? Just because someone doesn't need it doesn't mean they saw it here. People i know who need very few of these need this one so it's a safe bet it hasn't been here. It's a good one for me!
Cheers
Mark



If our airforces are never used, they have achieved their finest goal.
— General Nathan F. Twining

graham luxton
Posts: 1817
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: EX ARCTIC CHALLENGE/BALTOPS/SABRE STRIKE/AMPLE STRIKE 17

Post by graham luxton » Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:50 pm

60-0002 certainly hasn't visited the UK since 1965 and I'd not seen it before. The "spotting" situation prior to 1965 was such that it may have visited and slipped through the net as weekday reports covering the English SAC bases were, in some cases, virtually non - existant! Weekends were another matter though and there was better coverage particularly when B-52's started making regular weekend visits from late '63 at Brize Norton, Fairford, Upper Heyford and Greenham Common.

Post Reply

Return to “RAF Fairford”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests