Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

F35 Update

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
User avatar
C24
Posts: 3408
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:52 am
Location: In the 51st State of the Union

Re: F35 Update

Post by C24 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:20 am

😷

The label “VISUAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM” in the video made me smile. Back in my day we used to call them “windows”

👐🏼🤡🛰
C24.
493d/48th - Grim Reapers Supporter.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/charlie-two-four/ FuzzyFastjetFotos, incorporating "HazyHelos"
There's no "go-round" in a glider.

Crusty
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:03 pm

Re: F35 Update

Post by Crusty » Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:21 am

Any ideas why they havn't dragged the thing up yet?, people in the know say its well within the capabilities of commercial firms to recover a similar sized craft from a mile down and I would expect its location to be known exactl,
or perhaps they turned off any XPDRS or ELT type devices so the Russkies can't find it and now they've lost it too?

pee up in a brewery on hold

Crusty
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:03 pm

Re: F35 Update

Post by Crusty » Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:26 am

2e1var wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 7:22 am
Quick to eject, obviously that wasn't recoverable but I wonder if in certain flight regimes the ejection is automatic ? I believe this was the case with the Harrier in certain circumstances.

Rich
There is an automatic system that senses the pitching forces if the lift fan fails and ejects the pilot, its possible this system operated

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:49 am

C24 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:20 am
😷

The label “VISUAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM” in the video made me smile. Back in my day we used to call them “windows”

👐🏼🤡🛰
:D

But a contractor cannot charge £50,000 for a 'window'

Perhaps it is so stealthy they can't find it

Doughnut
Posts: 1266
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am

Re: F35 Update

Post by Doughnut » Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:43 am

A hopefully simple technical question. Can the F-35B take off from the carrier ramp without using the lift fan ? Obviously in this instance it did not but could the main engine in reheat not produce enough thrust to get airbourn ?

POL
Posts: 16978
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: F35 Update

Post by POL » Tue Nov 30, 2021 12:10 pm

I don't think thrust is the issue, it'll be a lack of lift.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 12:16 pm

Doughnut wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:43 am
A hopefully simple technical question. Can the F-35B take off from the carrier ramp without using the lift fan ? Obviously in this instance it did not but could the main engine in reheat not produce enough thrust to get airbourn ?

Not without a catapult I shouldn't have thought

I wonder where the <V1 stopping point is on the carrier? Perhaps there isn't one - brakes off (committee?!) Committed to fly?

Supra
Posts: 2884
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: F35 Update

Post by Supra » Tue Nov 30, 2021 12:28 pm

Lots of 'what if' theories, but one thing is clear...Had the jet had a tad more speed & the pilot pulled the stick fully back, then ejected! He could have been the first F-35 pilot to land back-on without his jet! :whistle: :clap:

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:08 pm

Does the pilot even fly it off the deck ?

F/A-18 catapulted ofF the deck are hands free - 'what ever you do don't touch the controls!'

User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Agent K » Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:11 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:08 pm
Does the pilot even fly it off the deck ?

F/A-18 catapulted of the deck are hands free - 'what ever you do don't touch the controls!'
I'd imagine so, a catapult will launch you in the correct direction, you can't move sideways and your speed etc is dictated by the catapult speed, you're a passenger in effect, for an F-35B you're still flying the aircraft and will need to use rudder and other controls to maintain the centreline and throttle etc. to control speed.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:19 pm

Sounds about right. I thought possibly the onboard computer was doing all that.

I think on balance you are correct because if it was a fully automated process the flight wouldn't have started rolling - you would like to think a sensor could/would have detected a problem.

The jets were not grounded so it seems like human error even though I realize that is speculating ahead of the facts.

Seahornet1
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Severn valley, South Shropshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Seahornet1 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:27 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:08 pm
Does the pilot even fly it off the deck ?

F/A-18 catapulted of the deck are hands free - 'what ever you do don't touch the controls!'
I know there's a lot of automation in the low-speed flight regime on the F-35B, making it much more user-friendly than the Harrier; whether this extends as far as: "To take off, click on the 'Take-Off' icon on the MFD...", well, maybe not...?

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:38 pm

Is that when the Microsoft Office Assistant paper clip pops up on the screen with a caption " it looks like you need more power. Need some help?"

Seahornet1
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Severn valley, South Shropshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Seahornet1 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:11 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:38 pm
Is that when the Microsoft Office Assistant paper clip pops up on the screen with a caption " it looks like you need more power. Need some help?"
Does MS Office Assistant have an friendly animated Ejector Seat character...? :P

User avatar
big john
Posts: 8051
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:53 am
Location: EGLL

Re: F35 Update

Post by big john » Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:14 pm

I've watched the clip several times and I think whatever failed happened just before the start of the ramp as it appears to slow down and about halfway up the nose goes down as if under heavy braking. The pilot then realises it's not going to stop and ejects.

And the BBC news says it is not real, it's only alleged to be the incident. The BBC must have employed an ex daily fail journalist. Or have there been so many incidents of an F-35 falling off the the ramp of a carrier it could be another one? :P
rgds
BJ
Always Watching: Always Listening
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 58372
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: F35 Update

Post by slogen51 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:16 pm

Seahornet1 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:11 pm
slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:38 pm
Is that when the Microsoft Office Assistant paper clip pops up on the screen with a caption " it looks like you need more power. Need some help?"
Does MS Office Assistant have an friendly animated Ejector Seat character...? :P
Just hit [ESC]

Seahornet1
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Severn valley, South Shropshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Seahornet1 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:26 pm

Doughnut wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 11:43 am
A hopefully simple technical question. Can the F-35B take off from the carrier ramp without using the lift fan ? Obviously in this instance it did not but could the main engine in reheat not produce enough thrust to get airbourn ?
Some basic data, and O-level Physics standard acceleration calcs might help. Given the whole deck length of 280 m for take off (not likely in practice, but this is a 'what if' question...) and assuming a power to mass ratio of about 1.2, for a lightly loaded F-35B, you might expect an 'off-the-ramp' speed of about 57 m/s, which is about 110 knots. With a good head wind, and the ship's forward speed added on, I'd say this might be just enough. Mind you, I haven't allowed for aerodynamic drag (I'd probably need an A-Level for that ;) ), so don't go trying it, just on my say-so! :halo:

Seahornet1
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Severn valley, South Shropshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Seahornet1 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:27 pm

slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:16 pm
Seahornet1 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:11 pm
slogen51 wrote:
Tue Nov 30, 2021 1:38 pm
Is that when the Microsoft Office Assistant paper clip pops up on the screen with a caption " it looks like you need more power. Need some help?"
Does MS Office Assistant have an friendly animated Ejector Seat character...? :P
Just hit [ESC]
:lol: :thumbs:

Snoop 95
Posts: 2077
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: West Suffolk

Re: F35 Update

Post by Snoop 95 » Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:29 pm

From the video of the event the pilot seems to eject over the bow of the ship and if so was lucky not to have been run over by it.

User avatar
Tally-ho
Posts: 823
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2015 7:12 am
Location: Nottinghamshire

Re: F35 Update

Post by Tally-ho » Tue Nov 30, 2021 4:09 pm

Bear in mind that HMS QE may have been stationary in the water during this incident. The F-35B does not need wind over the bow to take off. Refer the testing and training videos on YouTube showing take-offs from non-moving ramps on the ground. Here's one:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNSO3NqVU2E

'Lift is a gift, thrust is a must' as the saying goes! There was a problem with thrust, caused by ... I don't know.

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bobby 1211 and 96 guests