FighterControl

Hi a had good time at lossie thanks robert for a great log
Couple of extra movements was the return of the Kaf c17
And kentucy ang c130 h
Looking forward to Tuesdays. Trip

Colin

Nearly forgot. Zf171 was back Raf c17 tonight

Colin, whilst some folk are definitely overly picky about some of your posts you're not doing yourself any favours calling a thread "pwk" in the Prestwick section. A date would be useful as a minimum.

And the RAF C-17A was actually ZZ177 as Ascot 6389 landed at 18:35pm.

ythanpythan wrote:Colin, whilst some folk are definitely overly picky about some of your posts you're not doing yourself any favours calling a thread "pwk" in the Prestwick section. A date would be useful as a minimum.

Am not interested in people's opinion
Colin.
I tell the public what came in to prestwick

Can't remember the C-17s being ZF registered either...

Well spotted my good man

Colin.
I tell the public what came in to prestwick[/quote]

Sorry Colin but people do struggle to understand your posting for movements at Prestwick. Invariably it seems other enthusiasts step in afterwards to make them correct .
Looking forward to Tuesdays trip you write but this needs clarification you must agree ?
Please try to make your postings in a clear way wherever possible

Thank you

Plane English
Looking forward to my trip to presrwick
Simple iv never seen or heard you at the mound no pun intended ??
Its high time I stood up for my self so!!!!

ythanpythan wrote:Colin, whilst some folk are definitely overly picky about some of your posts you're not doing yourself any favours calling a thread "pwk" in the Prestwick section. A date would be useful as a minimum.

PWK is the code for Chicago Executive airport and PIK is the code for Prestwick, no need for either to be used in the title and I agree that a date (or dates) would be very useful instead.

OK no worries.

venom wrote:OK no worries.

So why can't you amend the title and correct the incorrect information that you have posted?

Mike wrote:

venom wrote:OK no worries.

So why can't you amend the title and correct the incorrect information that you have posted?

You
Realy Are becoming a pain mike on your bike mike
Ha I think that s good by my standard s

OO there was another us navy herc tonight
Bad venom.

venom wrote:

Mike wrote:

venom wrote:OK no worries.

So why can't you amend the title and correct the incorrect information that you have posted?

You
Realy Are becoming a pain mike on your bike mike
Ha I think that s good by my standard s

OO there was another us navy herc tonight
Bad venom.

It's not me that's posting incorrect information - it's you and you will never admit that you're wrong. You can read everyone else's posts perfectly well and reply to them, so why can't you read your own posts and edit them before you post them?

By the way, I don't have a bike.

For heaven's sake, you two, leave it out - please.

The US Navy C-130T should be 165314/JW - CNV6022.

Can I just direct people to Forum rules 4 and 9 in particular.Despite perfectly reasonable requests it would appear Colin you take no notice of polite suggestions from other enthusiasts who are simply seeking information on Prestwick activity and are not interested entering into a war of words.

Thank you rh226 for a clear concise report on a C130 which is all that we require.

OK understood I'm a moderator on a group on f/ b an I think I would be saying the same bob
Colin