Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Please post movements and activities to do with RAF Lossiemouth here
Gloria Finis

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Gloria Finis » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:35 pm

The truth is, that nobody, be they YES or No orientated, knows what will happen to RAF Lossiemouth after independence - even with a crystal ball. Should the vote be YES, on 18 September 2014, it will then depend entirely on approximately 18 months of pre-independence negotiations, to arrive at a post-independence outcome. In the meantime, RAF Lossiemouth is an active base - let us be thankful for that.

No matter how the vote goes, large amounts of money have been spent on RAF Lossiemouth, recently - a recipe for closure perhaps?
Last edited by Gloria Finis on Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Sky Pirate
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Inverness

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Sky Pirate » Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:52 pm

onemac wrote:
Adam wrote:So after the televised debate yesterday, what are your opinions? Have they changed?
No - I quite clearly still think Alex Salmond is a shitebag :cool:


Shitebag!!! Do you know the man personally ?? No i thought so,he could have you for slander with that remark Al, Remember people it is not Salmond that the vote is about!!


Hugh...who comes from a long line o Shitebags...whatever they are... :D

User avatar
Fighterfoto
Posts: 726
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:01 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Fighterfoto » Sat Aug 30, 2014 3:34 pm

It would be libel, not slander, but it's only defamatory if it isn't true.....

What is a shitebag anyway?
Never trust a grown man with a nickname

scimitar
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by scimitar » Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:00 pm

Fighterfoto wrote:It would be libel, not slander, but it's only defamatory if it isn't true.....

What is a shitebag anyway?
According to the urban dictionary it's a wimp or a dastardly type. Which, in actual fact, means it's not slander, libel or defamatory cause it's true.
Canon EOS1200D
Canon 18-55mm
Tamron 70-300mm
Tamron 150-600mm

User avatar
Jazz
Posts: 922
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: KAAB

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Jazz » Sat Aug 30, 2014 4:34 pm

scimitar wrote:
Fighterfoto wrote:It would be libel, not slander, but it's only defamatory if it isn't true.....

What is a shitebag anyway?
According to the urban dictionary it's a wimp or a dastardly type. Which, in actual fact, means it's not slander, libel or defamatory cause it's true.
Difficult to argue with that :D
Dieu et mon droit. In hoc signo vinces

scimitar
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by scimitar » Sat Aug 30, 2014 5:02 pm

chopperscot wrote:You guys are still missing the point by a country mile, it's not about Salmond, it's about me, my family and everyone who lives in Scotland.
Attack the figurehead all you want. It will never Change the minds of Yes voters.
And there's still no word on here from any undecided voters, so this has just turned into a slagging match!
As they say Bitter Together :-)
You almost got that right, it's about the fact that neither my family, friends or myself can afford to cash the cheques that the the SNP and it's idiotic leadership are writing!!!
Canon EOS1200D
Canon 18-55mm
Tamron 70-300mm
Tamron 150-600mm

User avatar
onemac
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by onemac » Sat Aug 30, 2014 6:10 pm

Sky Pirate wrote:Shitebag!!! Do you know the man personally ?? No i thought so,he could have you for slander with that remark Al......
I don't know him personally Hugh but I have met the man several times. I formed my opinion from those interactions along with what he said out loud supposedly out of earshot on one occasion. I also didn't like the way he condoned the SNP Policy of shutting all the Scottish bases and then turned up for the publicity on the 'Save RAF Lossiemouth' march but not for the 'Save RAF Leuchars campaign' - kind of two-faced if you ask me.
chopperscot wrote:You guys are still missing the point by a country mile, it's not about Salmond, it's about me, my family and everyone who lives in Scotland.
I understand it's not about Salmond but it IS what the SNP want and as their leader the buck stops there. He's leading the campaign and not being forthright in the process - you just can't say 'we'll just do this, sod the rest of them'.
chopperscot wrote:Attack the figurehead all you want. It will never Change the minds of Yes voters.
I realise that but the Yes voters are either card-carrying members of the SNP, followers of the SNP or those who just bimble along in life letting others think and speak for them.
chopperscot wrote:And there's still no word on here from any undecided voters, so this has just turned into a slagging match!
So that's your intentions then -to lure the undecided and state your case. Fair enough but apart from a few individuals I should think the majority of the regular users of this forum are fed up with this - I know I am.
chopperscot wrote:As they say Bitter Together :-)
Who say's that - not the SNP surely? ;)

See you at the Polling Station.


Al - Over & Out.

ythanpythan
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:50 am

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by ythanpythan » Sat Aug 30, 2014 6:44 pm

onemac wrote:... but the Yes voters are either card-carrying members of the SNP, followers of the SNP or those who just bimble along in life letting others think and speak for them.
A statement that does you and a significant portion of your fellow countrymen a disservice.

Malcolm
Posts: 4289
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:26 am

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Malcolm » Sat Aug 30, 2014 8:34 pm

chopperscot wrote:Image
Would you care to explain/debate the Oil and gas figures?

Image

Stolen from here : http://www.newsnetscotland.com/index.ph ... ffect.html

Govt figures put over 10% of oil in English waters, and in excess of 60% of the gas in English waters. That assumes the median line is used to divide English and Scottish waters. The current agreement actually puts even more oil and gas in English waters. So where do your figures come from?

Scotland is a nett exporter of electricity to the rUK - basically because it has two huge nuclear power stations. I hope you've considered the decommissioning costs, and what you're going to do with the nuclear waste, and what you're going to replace them with when they reach their sell by date.

scimitar
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by scimitar » Sat Aug 30, 2014 9:09 pm

And the yes campaigners show their true colours. It's all about bullying people into agreeing with them. No such thing as free speech unless you say your a yes voter. Well I'm an no voter primarily because I won't have a job if there's a yes vote. But hey that's fine I'll be better off on the dole in an independent scotland. After all the SNP will give me that special currency, you know the one you can spend hundreds of times over.
A future for my kids, no chance, a return to the 18th century, every chance.
Canon EOS1200D
Canon 18-55mm
Tamron 70-300mm
Tamron 150-600mm

User avatar
onemac
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by onemac » Sat Aug 30, 2014 11:30 pm

ythanpythan wrote:
onemac wrote:... but the Yes voters are either card-carrying members of the SNP, followers of the SNP or those who just bimble along in life letting others think and speak for them.
A statement that does you and a significant portion of your fellow countrymen a disservice.
Apologies Ian - I should have added 'and those who can think clearly and decide for themselves' (I thought that was a given).

Carry on with the 'discussion' it's very interesting.

Al

User avatar
Blue Diamond
Posts: 3043
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:06 am

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Blue Diamond » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:21 am

Quoting the percentage of fish landings is of little consequence to the argument as the vast majority of UK fish supplies come from non UK waters. 95% of the cod used in the UK comes from non EU sources so the relatively small amount landed in Scotland wON'T make a great deal of difference if it becomes unavailable to the rest of the UK.
Last edited by Blue Diamond on Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fighting 92 - The King Cobras
http://www.92squadron.org.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.92squadron.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Thunder
Posts: 5317
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Thunder » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:52 pm

scimitar wrote:And the yes campaigners show their true colours. It's all about bullying people into agreeing with them. No such thing as free speech unless you say your a yes voter.
Quite amazing just how many people will agree with that. I work with a couple of Yes voters and you cannot have a civilised discussion with them before they start to show hatred towards any other opinion but their own.

User avatar
Jazz
Posts: 922
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:31 pm
Location: KAAB

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Jazz » Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:14 pm

Thunder wrote:
scimitar wrote:And the yes campaigners show their true colours. It's all about bullying people into agreeing with them. No such thing as free speech unless you say your a yes voter.
Quite amazing just how many people will agree with that. I work with a couple of Yes voters and you cannot have a civilised discussion with them before they start to show hatred towards any other opinion but their own.
Kinda reflected in todays 'Sinister Mobbery' story. "You will believe in me, Let us advance"... :O

Image
Dieu et mon droit. In hoc signo vinces

scimitar
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by scimitar » Sun Aug 31, 2014 5:58 pm

I think someone should go and lie down in a dark room without access to sharp objects.
Canon EOS1200D
Canon 18-55mm
Tamron 70-300mm
Tamron 150-600mm

scimitar
Posts: 721
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:41 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by scimitar » Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:42 pm

chopperscot wrote:Or internet ;-) xxx
If there's a yes vote you'll be ok as they didn't have the internet in the 18th century. :halo:
Canon EOS1200D
Canon 18-55mm
Tamron 70-300mm
Tamron 150-600mm

User avatar
Thunder
Posts: 5317
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Thunder » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:13 pm

chopperscot wrote:I think Blair should be arrested for War Crimes, and for being absent from his job of Middle East envoy.
War crimes, no chance!! Ok the coalition didn't find any WMD's but they were there. In the 12 months building up to the invasion of Iraq the amount of so called "Humanitarian aid flights" to Syria for the earthquake that happened there was enormous, yet very little aid was received from Iraq. So ask yourself, what was really on those flights? I've worked in Iraq and it's not until you hear the personnel stories from normal Iraqis that you'll see why Saddam had to go. I've spoke with ex Generals of the Army and Navy and they all said they had some scary **** in their arsenal. The thing we did do wrong was appointing a self governing Government too early, resulting in a poor and weak choice.

However I do agree that Blair was a twit on a ego boosting mission for his terms as PM. Between himself and Brown it was them alone that brought this country to it's knees and he knew it, hence why he jumped when he did. That's what happens when you borrow money that you haven't got then can't afford to pay it back, hold on isn't that the big plan for Eck and the SNP?

As for Maggie she should be made a saint :halo:

User avatar
onemac
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by onemac » Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:30 pm

With you there Scott - the only PM since WWII (that's two NOT eleven) to have the balls to defend our territory. Can't see Alex defending Rockall, let alone siding with the other six Celtic Nations.

Al

hertsman

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence: Avoiding a power vac

Post by hertsman » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:29 pm

A thought has just occurred. If an independent Scotland is not admitted to the EU, it could corner the market in powerful vacuum cleaners and run them over the border to England at dead of night. Everyone wins. The extra income could help make up any shortfall in Scotland's North Sea reserves and England is rescued from this pathetic ***** nonsense.

hertsman

User avatar
Sky Pirate
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:12 pm
Location: Inverness

Re: RAF Lossiemouth after Independence?

Post by Sky Pirate » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:56 pm

:D
onemac wrote:With you there Scott - the only PM since WWII (that's two NOT eleven) to have the balls to defend our territory. Can't see Alex defending Rockall, let alone siding with the other six Celtic Nations.

Al
And all of Scotland voted Tory??..
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-0fI7tqknb0w/T ... otland.jpg

Over and out!!!...lol

Locked

Return to “RAF Lossiemouth”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests