Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
CSG25 - Marham Jets
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57632
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
ZM144/145 were less than six years old and probably flew on average once per week and that is being generous but I suppose in terms of other nations F-35 in Europe the RAF jets are the oldest by some years
-
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:20 pm
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Good Evenning,
Given the earlier mention of limited upgrades available for the TR-1 airframes can anyone please confirm which UK serial a/c this would apply to ?
If ZM144 and ZM145 have been upgraded from TR-2 to TR-3 presumably that limits the TR-1 airframes to ZM135 to ZM143.
Potentially would that mean that a pair of TR-1 will remain in the US just for trials in order to support a small proportion of the fleet ?
Thanks,
Paul
Given the earlier mention of limited upgrades available for the TR-1 airframes can anyone please confirm which UK serial a/c this would apply to ?
If ZM144 and ZM145 have been upgraded from TR-2 to TR-3 presumably that limits the TR-1 airframes to ZM135 to ZM143.
Potentially would that mean that a pair of TR-1 will remain in the US just for trials in order to support a small proportion of the fleet ?
Thanks,
Paul
Last edited by Evergreen 44 on Tue May 06, 2025 5:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57632
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
ZM143/009 went to Cherry Point recently to replace ZM144/010 and ZM145/011 which both returned to Marham
Ascot 9731-9734 on the deck at Marham via Cherry Point on Sunday 4th May 2025
ZM144/010 no marks
ZM145/011 no marks
ZM171/037 lightning flash
ZM172/038 lightning flash
May as well update the summary
By my reckoning that leaves 13 Operational F-35B at Marham : ( 13 at Marham, 18 on HMS PoW, 6 in Conus) and one w/o
____________________________________________________________
Four assumed at Edwards AFB
ZM135/001, ZM136/002, ZM138/004, ZM165/031
One at NAS Patuxent River
ZM170/036
One on maintenance at Cherry Point
ZM143/009 departed 28-4-2025
1 written off (stored at Marham)
ZM152/018 w.o 17-11-2021
18 on the PoW ( in serial order)
ZM137/003, ZM139/005, ZM140/006, ZM141/007, ZM146/012, ZM150/016
ZM153/019, ZM156/022, ZM157/023, ZM158/024, ZM159/025, ZM160/026
ZM161/027, ZM163/029, ZM164/030, ZM167/033, ZM168/034, ZM169/035
13 operational at Marham
ZM142/008, ZM144/010,ZM145/011 ZM147/013, ZM148/014, ZM149/015
ZM151/017, ZM154/020, ZM155/021, ZM162/028, ZM166/032, ZM171/037,ZM172/038
= 38 : ZM172/038
(* I haven't noted ZM147/013 since 28-10-2024 when it returned to Marham from HMS Prince of Wales
ZM151/017 not noted since July 2024?
ZM154/020 not noted since 17-03-2024?
)
Ascot 9731-9734 on the deck at Marham via Cherry Point on Sunday 4th May 2025
ZM144/010 no marks
ZM145/011 no marks
ZM171/037 lightning flash
ZM172/038 lightning flash
May as well update the summary
By my reckoning that leaves 13 Operational F-35B at Marham : ( 13 at Marham, 18 on HMS PoW, 6 in Conus) and one w/o
____________________________________________________________
Four assumed at Edwards AFB
ZM135/001, ZM136/002, ZM138/004, ZM165/031
One at NAS Patuxent River
ZM170/036
One on maintenance at Cherry Point
ZM143/009 departed 28-4-2025
1 written off (stored at Marham)
ZM152/018 w.o 17-11-2021
18 on the PoW ( in serial order)
ZM137/003, ZM139/005, ZM140/006, ZM141/007, ZM146/012, ZM150/016
ZM153/019, ZM156/022, ZM157/023, ZM158/024, ZM159/025, ZM160/026
ZM161/027, ZM163/029, ZM164/030, ZM167/033, ZM168/034, ZM169/035
13 operational at Marham
ZM142/008, ZM144/010,ZM145/011 ZM147/013, ZM148/014, ZM149/015
ZM151/017, ZM154/020, ZM155/021, ZM162/028, ZM166/032, ZM171/037,ZM172/038
= 38 : ZM172/038
(* I haven't noted ZM147/013 since 28-10-2024 when it returned to Marham from HMS Prince of Wales
ZM151/017 not noted since July 2024?
ZM154/020 not noted since 17-03-2024?
)
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Great update again, thanks slogen.
Do 17sqn operate from Pax as well then? Or is ZM170 on loan to a USN test sqn or something for weapons integration? I know they've done the Meteor missile testing from Pax.
Do 17sqn operate from Pax as well then? Or is ZM170 on loan to a USN test sqn or something for weapons integration? I know they've done the Meteor missile testing from Pax.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57632
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Sorry for lack of reply - I have no idea
I heard ZM170 is at Pax but it is possible/likely there are two at Pax River? Maybe ZM165
I heard ZM170 is at Pax but it is possible/likely there are two at Pax River? Maybe ZM165
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
ZM170 went to Pax River, via Eglin on 16/01/2025 as Hustler 91.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57632
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
For what it is worth last year at Fort Worth I also heard and saw Hustler 91 - a AL F-35A delivery (5728)
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Hi Evergreen.Evergreen 44 wrote: ↑Mon May 05, 2025 7:31 pmGood Evenning,
Given the earlier mention of limited upgrades available for the TR-1 airframes can anyone please confirm which UK serial a/c this would apply to ?
If ZM144 and ZM145 have been upgraded from TR-2 to TR-3 presumably that limits the TR-1 airframes to ZM135 to ZM143.
Potentially would that mean that a pair of TR-1 will remain in the US just for trials in order to support a small proportion of the fleet ?
Thanks,
Paul
I'm not sure which frames make up the original TR-1 build. My understanding was that some of the first aircraft assigned to 17 sqn were being "de-wired" at Ogden and then will eventually come over to Marham. I think this ties in with other information I've seen about newer airframes being instrumented up to replace the older frames. They only usually have 3 frames as standard.
Using slogen's great list, there's currently 5 in the US being used for testing/evaluations. My guess would be that ZM165/ZM170 and another new one will stay out there with 17sqn.
ZM135/ZM136/ZM138 will all be "de-wired" and sent over to Marham. Pure speculation on my part though, I have no idea.
-
- Posts: 2976
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:20 pm
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Thanks RubyRoo,
Yes, that seems to be the accepted understanding on the early airframes being replaced as it makes sense for later developmemt work to be done with TR-2/TR-3 spec. machines which is now more prevalent
A bit disappointing that TR-1's are effectively time-warp spec. which is bound to reduce their effectiveness for combat.
They will become over-priced training machines unless they can be part-exchanged to the USMC and we can have more TR-3 as later builds for a fully effective fleet
Time will tell but I guess we will not see full value for money from this project in the long-term
Regards,
Paul
Yes, that seems to be the accepted understanding on the early airframes being replaced as it makes sense for later developmemt work to be done with TR-2/TR-3 spec. machines which is now more prevalent
A bit disappointing that TR-1's are effectively time-warp spec. which is bound to reduce their effectiveness for combat.
They will become over-priced training machines unless they can be part-exchanged to the USMC and we can have more TR-3 as later builds for a fully effective fleet
Time will tell but I guess we will not see full value for money from this project in the long-term
Regards,
Paul
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
Hi PaulEvergreen 44 wrote: ↑Fri May 09, 2025 6:34 pmThanks RubyRoo,
Yes, that seems to be the accepted understanding on the early airframes being replaced as it makes sense for later developmemt work to be done with TR-2/TR-3 spec. machines which is now more prevalent
A bit disappointing that TR-1's are effectively time-warp spec. which is bound to reduce their effectiveness for combat.
They will become over-priced training machines unless they can be part-exchanged to the USMC and we can have more TR-3 as later builds for a fully effective fleet
Time will tell but I guess we will not see full value for money from this project in the long-term
Regards,
Paul
Supposedly the TR-1 frames are able to undergo limited upgrades but will never reach TR-3/Block 4 standard. I think they’ll still play a vital role even if they aren’t fully able to get to where the other frames will be. Tranche 2 (27 aircraft) will all be to the new standard as well so it should hopefully only be a small part of the fleet which never gets there.
Re: CSG25 - Marham Jets
ZM174/BK-40 was noted outside at Fort Worth 13/05/25. Credit to Scramble.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests