Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

VC-22's

Please post movements and activities to do with RAF Mildenhall here
POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:46 pm

THe CV-22Bs are -0057 and -0058, as far as I know the fiscal has still not been confirmed.

User avatar
Mike
Posts: 22760
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by Mike » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:48 pm

ChrisGlobe wrote:THe CV-22Bs are -0057 and -0058, as far as I know the fiscal has still not been confirmed.
Should be 12 according to :- http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_serials/2012.html

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:51 pm

Should being the operative word :P

User avatar
Mike
Posts: 22760
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by Mike » Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:59 pm

Scroll down to the bottom :- http://www.helis.com/database/model/261/

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:01 pm

Until someone reads it off the airframe or provides a source, I'm sticking with "should" and "unconfirmed" - too many times people have just gone along with what everyone else says and it's been wrong (I've done it too!)

User avatar
Mike
Posts: 22760
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by Mike » Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:05 pm

ChrisGlobe wrote:Until someone reads it off the airframe or provides a source, I'm sticking with "should" and "unconfirmed" - too many times people have just gone along with what everyone else says and it's been wrong (I've done it too!)
Yup, I agree - for once ! :P :P

User avatar
tommc
Posts: 1053
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:11 pm
Location: Suffolk, UK
Contact:

Re: VC-22's

Post by tommc » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:36 pm

Mike wrote:Scroll down to the bottom :- http://www.helis.com/database/model/261/
Well, that says they are 21 SOS and that is definitely WRONG.

User avatar
Rubberneck
Posts: 3533
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:05 am
Location: Grimsby / Doncaster

Re: VC-22's

Post by Rubberneck » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:42 pm

on the inbound flight plan they put 11-0057 for the lead aircraft - didn't include the serial for the second though. This may be what is causing the confusion.

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:59 pm

Left hand side of the fuselage near the cockpit should have the data plate on it... ;)

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

rh226

Re: VC-22's

Post by rh226 » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:50 pm

Yes, but...... letters/numbers are only 0.5in high!!! Very high power lenses required.
Last edited by rh226 on Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rh226

Re: VC-22's

Post by rh226 » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:53 pm

Nice one, Adam :thumbs:

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Thu Jul 04, 2013 8:54 pm

This should do the trick! Should work on tour camera, too! :P

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/co ... 1700mm.htm

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Dougie
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by Dougie » Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:19 am

Both of the CV-22s are FY11. '0058' has 11-0058 on the radio call plate in the cockpit and also on the manufacturers plate. I have read it myself. The construction number of '0058' is D1037 and not D1039. I haven't read off the c/n of '0057' but I suspect it will be D1036.

Dougie

Dougie
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by Dougie » Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:53 am

The next delivery should be in a couple of months time.

RichC

Re: VC-22's

Post by RichC » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:17 am

Since when have the Ospreys been assigned to POTUS?

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:18 am

RichC wrote:Since when have the Ospreys been assigned to POTUS?
http://defensetech.org/2013/05/17/presi ... paint-job/ :ninja: (Yes, I know they're still designated MV-22s, and I know the point you're making :P)

User avatar
Matthew Clements
Posts: 299
Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:22 pm
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:

Re: VC-22's

Post by Matthew Clements » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:07 pm

Dougie wrote:Both of the CV-22s are FY11. '0058' has 11-0058 on the radio call plate in the cockpit and also on the manufacturers plate. I have read it myself. The construction number of '0058' is D1037 and not D1039. I haven't read off the c/n of '0057' but I suspect it will be D1036.

Dougie
I read 11-0057 off today, straight from the plate:-

SER 110057 (11-0057)
ACCEPTED 12/03/2013
MFR EFF NO (C/n) D1036

So that is both confirmed now.

Cheers

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: VC-22's

Post by POL » Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:08 pm

Cheers Matt :thumb:

Post Reply

Return to “RAF Mildenhall”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests