Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Fairford reactivation
Fairford reactivation
Hi just a general question how often will the RC-135's operate out of fairford. How often do they operate out of mildenhall currently.
2024 Airshows
Sywell, RIAT, Airpower, Duxford BOB
Sywell, RIAT, Airpower, Duxford BOB
Re: Fairford reactivation
Roughly 3 times a week, can be as often as daily when its busy.
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57798
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: Fairford reactivation
Plus they always go up with a tanker
Re: Fairford reactivation
No they don't
http://www.airfighters.com/photosearch.php?phgid=SHED" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; LOADES
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last
What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last
What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???
- Ghost from above
- Posts: 342
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:17 pm
Re: Fairford reactivation
They won't need a tanker after the runway works as with the strengthening of the ends they have the take off distance with a full load of fuel.
Mac
Puff the Magic Dragon the original suppressor
Puff the Magic Dragon the original suppressor
Re: Fairford reactivation
Many thanks guys. Do we think that transitioning USAF aircraft will use Fairford as they do Mildenhall and Prestwick post mildenhall closure.
2024 Airshows
Sywell, RIAT, Airpower, Duxford BOB
Sywell, RIAT, Airpower, Duxford BOB
-
- Posts: 777
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:45 pm
- Location: Fairford, Gloucestershire
Re: Fairford reactivation
Yes they will from what I have been told.
Re: Fairford reactivation
US DoD FY2020 Budget - Construction Programs retains $46.5m for RC135 infrastructure at Fairford (incl. runway overrun re-configuration), plus $19m for munitions holding area , and $87m for DABS-FEV storage . All carried over from FY 2019 so unclear when spend will actuslly occur .
Re: Fairford reactivation
Could be busier if Prestwick is turned into a housing estate as rumours go!!


If you can keep your head whilst all around are losing theirs, you have probably completely misread the situation!!
Re: Fairford reactivation
Hi mildenhall is now open until 2027 plus if it then closes. How longs a piece of string.
Re: Fairford reactivation
I heard from a very good source that the way things are going Mildenhall won't close at all, I'm sure there will be comments about that..piece of string exactly.
If you can keep your head whilst all around are losing theirs, you have probably completely misread the situation!!
-
- Posts: 777
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:45 pm
- Location: Fairford, Gloucestershire
Re: Fairford reactivation
Civil engineering guys from USAF have now moved to fairford on posting, work is starting already, runways overuns were being measured up by a contractor about a month ago.
Re: Fairford reactivation
I am in the course of doing a little construction work myself and found that material costs have significantly increased. Though millions of dollars sound impressive, so are costs and some of the Fairford work is for bombers. As Pune mentioned there are rumors that Mildenhall won't close. Have the USAF/RAF run out of bases to close - creating new ones is an expensive, protracted business - so have we reach a tipping point?
Filmman
Filmman
Re: Fairford reactivation
I am in the course of doing a little construction work myself and found that material costs have significantly increased. Though millions of dollars sound impressive, so are costs and some of the Fairford work is for bombers. As Pune mentioned there are rumors that Mildenhall won't close. Have the USAF/RAF run out of bases to close - creating new ones is an expensive, protracted business - so have we reach a tipping point?
Filmman
Filmman
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:05 pm
- Location: Loughborough
- Contact:
Re: Fairford reactivation
I honestly think closing Mildenhall is a very rushed and very bad idea.
But who knows maybe the RAF might find a use for it with all our bases we are closing well need it thats for sure!
But who knows maybe the RAF might find a use for it with all our bases we are closing well need it thats for sure!
The Harrier Jump Jet - The best there is, The best there was and The best there ever will be!
Model Harriers in the stash = 73 and counting.
Model Harriers in the stash = 73 and counting.
- Nighthawke
- Posts: 6283
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:04 pm
Re: Fairford reactivation
Er no... the RAF stations are being closed because they're not needed.
You've seen this thread?
viewtopic.php?f=287&t=108625
You've seen this thread?
viewtopic.php?f=287&t=108625
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 9:05 pm
- Location: Loughborough
- Contact:
Re: Fairford reactivation
Not needed?
Haha I'm not sure the RAF have properly thought about it to be honest, all it would take is 3 individual attacks and our fighter force and USAFE fighters (Coningsby, Lossiemouth & Lakenheath) are done and we have no air defence, that's not a very good thought to be honest.
Haha I'm not sure the RAF have properly thought about it to be honest, all it would take is 3 individual attacks and our fighter force and USAFE fighters (Coningsby, Lossiemouth & Lakenheath) are done and we have no air defence, that's not a very good thought to be honest.
The Harrier Jump Jet - The best there is, The best there was and The best there ever will be!
Model Harriers in the stash = 73 and counting.
Model Harriers in the stash = 73 and counting.
Re: Fairford reactivation
Since your knowledge about this matter is clearly more accurate than anyone in the RAF or the Ministry of Defence, perhaps you should make your services available to Mr Johnson forthwith?Maverick231 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2019 3:37 amNot needed?
Haha I'm not sure the RAF have properly thought about it to be honest, all it would take is 3 individual attacks and our fighter force and USAFE fighters (Coningsby, Lossiemouth & Lakenheath) are done and we have no air defence, that's not a very good thought to be honest.
-
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 6:21 pm
Re: Fairford reactivation
Not so much the R.A.F. but the M.O.D. methinks. It's not too long ago that N.A.T.O. complained about the lack of contribution Belgium was making; their airforce was limited to very low flying time.
I still think the 'HS' project is a waste; additional freight dedicated routes maybe and divert some of the savings towards our armed forces. As for electrifying our local Lakes line WHAT IS THE POINT.
Sorry, I mustn't go on like this; it's the weather you know!
Roger
Edit: Hello, there's a Belgium C-130 up on Donnyradar.
I still think the 'HS' project is a waste; additional freight dedicated routes maybe and divert some of the savings towards our armed forces. As for electrifying our local Lakes line WHAT IS THE POINT.
Sorry, I mustn't go on like this; it's the weather you know!
Roger
Edit: Hello, there's a Belgium C-130 up on Donnyradar.
Re: Fairford reactivation
Who exactly is going to attack our bases simultaneously then? As said the bases shut because there isn’t a need for them anymore as we operate far less a/c and types of a/c. However if any of the ex bases are going to be reactivated then I would put my money on Kinloss, due to it’s location within the UK and it’s proximity to Lossie for use as a diversionary airfield. I’ve heard that this possibility has already been looked into within the MoD.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests