Yeovilton 26/10/16

Post by **farnboroughrob** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 2:30 pm

quick look around 12:45
XZ689/314 Lynx RN
ZF563/312 Lynx RN
ZH834/84 Merlin HM2 RN
ZJ129/N Merlin HC RN
ZJ137/W Merlin HC RN
ZJ992/AB Merlin HC RN
ZZ379 Wildcat RN
ZZ533 Wildcat RN

Rob

Post by **Seaking93** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 3:21 pm

farnboroughrob wrote:quick look around 12:45
XZ689/314 Lynx RN
ZF563/312 Lynx RN
ZH834/84 Merlin HM2 RN
ZJ129/N Merlin HC RN
ZJ137/W Merlin HC RN
ZJ992/AB Merlin HC RN
ZZ379 Wildcat RN
ZZ533 Wildcat RN

Rob

Rob

The Merlin HM2 was ZH851/84, last I heard ZH834 was still in MDMF at Culdrose

Bob

Post by **farnboroughrob** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 4:09 pm

Thanks, out of date info then.
Rob

Post by **Seaking93** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 5:01 pm

farnboroughrob wrote:Thanks, out of date info then.
Rob

It was side on to me this morning and read it off

Bob

Post by **slogen51** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:03 am

No offence intended and I hope you don't think I am interfering but :-

I think it is important to highlight serials that were not actually read off in a log by putting the serial in brackets for example (ZH834)/84 or (163211)/AC 311 etc. Especially if the information is being posted on the web.

Post by **Freeman Lowell** » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:56 am

Slogen,
I don't think anyone would be offended. You're simply stating good practice. I'm surprised it's not mentioned in the forum rules. Mods?
Freeman

Yeovilton 26/10/16

Yeovilton 26/10/16

Re: Yeovilton 26/10/16

Re: Yeovilton 26/10/16

Re: Yeovilton 26/10/16

Re: Yeovilton 26/10/16

Re: Yeovilton 26/10/16

Who is online