Page 1 of 1
New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:10 pm
by brumbee
On Sunday 26th January I popped into Cobham services on the M25 and I could not help but see a MIG 21 on a low loader parked in the HGV area . Closer inspection revealed the serial 1811 so I am presuming it is the MIG21M formally at Dabrowa Gornicza . The lorry had polish plates so the question is where was it off to ?
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 9:22 am
by Yammer
or possibly ( but more unliklely ) the other 1811 an ex Polish Mig-21PF from the States
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:56 pm
by brumbee
I did notice there were 2 1811's - but N21PF has a distinctive paint job whereas the 1811 I saw was still in it's basic silver finish and was very much like the last pictures I have seen from when it was preserved in Poland.
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 8:24 pm
by tommc
brumbee wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:10 pm
On Sunday 26th January I popped into Cobham services on the M25 and I could not help but see a MIG 21 on a low loader parked in the HGV area . Closer inspection revealed the serial 1811 so I am presuming it is the MIG21M formally at Dabrowa Gornicza . The lorry had polish plates so the question is where was it off to ?
7811, Alton, Hants
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 8:38 pm
by POL
If this is c/n 967811 does that mean it's reappeared for the first time since 1994?!
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 10:32 pm
by brumbee
Going back to the sighting at the motorway services the aircraft was loaded with the tail planes separate and placed either side next to the cockpit area so I had to stick my head around this to see the serial so the fact I read it as 1811 and not 7811 does add up. I didn't want to poke around too much to draw attention to myself as the driver was probably asleep in his cab. The MIG was also engineless , nice addition to the UK preservation scene though .
Re: New MIG 21 for the UK
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2020 8:54 am
by pg1610
the following from Phil A,
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78891834@ ... ateposted/
the faded serial could easily be mistaken for 1811 under the conditions described by OP