The following pair of serials I require assistance with please
(a)
Frankfurt EDDF/FRA) April 21st, 1984
I have a US Army UH-1 logged as 16560 - looking to confirm the fiscal year of 66, rather than 68 & the operating unit.
(b)
Ramstein (ETAR/RMS) April 21st, 1984
I have a serial of 20974 F-16 - no tail code.
Now, 20974 was a Fokker built F-16A which was at the time, April 1984, with the 363rdTFW at Shaw AFB, Therefore I suspect a miss pole, so before I consign it to the trash, anyone able to sort this out.
MTIA for any reply
Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Serial Queries April 1984
Re: Serial Queries April 1984
16560 would be 66- fiscal, almost certainly 22 AvnDet from Pirmasens.
No idea on the F-16 though - perhaps 80-0574 from Hahn?
Cheers, ZF.
No idea on the F-16 though - perhaps 80-0574 from Hahn?
Cheers, ZF.
Re: Serial Queries April 1984
Perhaps, or perhaps not, the F-16 could be 82-0914 from 401TFW Torrejon (was also at IAT 1985).
Re: Serial Queries April 1984
ZF & rh226 (Bob)
Many thanks for the replies
The FY for the UH-1 confirms my suspicion on that and thanks for the operating unit.
The two F-16 serials gives me something to work on, many thanks.
Many thanks for the replies
The FY for the UH-1 confirms my suspicion on that and thanks for the operating unit.
The two F-16 serials gives me something to work on, many thanks.
Re: Serial Queries April 1984
The F-16 query is homing in on 00574 from Hahn
Hahn was closed for runway work and the F-16 fleet was dispersed around the bases, one of them being Ramstein where 00574/HR F-16A 315thTFS/50thTFW was sent. The TJ F-16A 20914 was reported at it's home base during April so I'm going to discount that.
Many thanks
Hahn was closed for runway work and the F-16 fleet was dispersed around the bases, one of them being Ramstein where 00574/HR F-16A 315thTFS/50thTFW was sent. The TJ F-16A 20914 was reported at it's home base during April so I'm going to discount that.
Many thanks
Re: Serial Queries April 1984
EA6B,
Glad it gave you a possibility - even if you were able to subsequently rule it out. After all, it was probably the most obvious for a mis-record/mis-pole.
Looks as if you will probably settle on the Hahn one, so good thing you asked the question.
Glad it gave you a possibility - even if you were able to subsequently rule it out. After all, it was probably the most obvious for a mis-record/mis-pole.
Looks as if you will probably settle on the Hahn one, so good thing you asked the question.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests