http://www.airfix.com/catalog/product/v ... gory/1215/

Tim S
Moderator: Flyingmonster
seven wrote:If you believe what he says. My Revell rep had a very different story when I was told of it. The all great Airfix however...
7
If you are not going to go into it, all i can think is its just a bit of commercial mud slinging!Vulcanone wrote:And Revell are bringing out an AEW.2 even if they have been less than polite about getting reference...!
http://www.britmodeller.com/forums/inde ... w-2/page-4
Tim S
Tame, but certainly not dire!seven wrote:If you think the Airfix releases are dire, wait til you see the Revell catalogue.. Apart from the Shack and a possible new tool Hawk in 1/72, there's not much else other than what's already been announced..
7
Aircraft duplication has been ever present and i thought it would be more prevalent in the train world. Lets face it, there are fewer basic train types than aircraft over the years.Sylar wrote:It's kind of a relief that the duplication shenanigans happen in the aviation modelling world as well. It's been happening with model railways for a number of years now, usually with Hornby at the centre of it. Not that it bothers me but a lot of people are quite prepared to start a proper fight over it!
Cheers
Shane
Seeing I was the as was the chap that received the rather rudely worded 'request' from Revell, unless your rep was responsible for sending it - he's not going to know much about it.seven wrote:If you believe what he says. My Revell rep had a very different story when I was told of it. The all great Airfix however...
7
I can't remember, it was so long ago! They are both bound to oh fudge it up anyway so rude or not(and I don't disbelieve you), there is still going to be two over priced Shackleton kits on the market, of more or less the same version.richw_82 wrote:A nice article from Airfix, and an update on the Shackleton. They had the sprues on display at Fairford and it looks extremely good!![]()
http://www.airfix.com/uk-en/news/workbench/5334/
Only just noticed this -
Seeing I was the as was the chap that received the rather rudely worded 'request' from Revell, unless your rep was responsible for sending it - he's not going to know much about it.seven wrote:If you believe what he says. My Revell rep had a very different story when I was told of it. The all great Airfix however...
7![]()
Naturally he will say different, as he's working for them. Given that we've also helped a few aviation magazines, and private researchers (including one for Haynes Publishing) its not as if we're solely on Airfix's side, or just pick and choose randomly who can see the manufacturers archive drawings. They got our support as they were polite and courteous from the initial contact, and took care with our archive.
Regards,
Rich W
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests