I'd forgotten about the issues of the A1 at Wittering but I now remember that this was discussed in the previous long-running thread over several pages about the same subject (which I can't find, but it's in the forum somewhere)!
Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Red Arrows New Base?
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
This season, I'll be mostly wearing........A THONG!
- David Vincent
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 7:13 am
- Location: Norwich
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
The other thing to consider is the impact of Jeremy Corbyn becoming PM in a few weeks from now, I doubt the Reds will see out his premiership so re-basing would cease to be a problem.
...a man too long without sleep, looking for a shortcut that he never found.
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
When they were at Scampton in the 1980s their restricted zone was 5nm radius up to 10,000' above airfield level. I cannot see any reason to suppose that their current requirements are any less. In the work-up phase they are flying 4 or 5 waves per working day. When they are flying nothing else moves in the restricted zone. That includes co-located aircraft. When they were at Cranwell the disruption to co-located units was immense, and that is before you factor in the impact on adjacent airfields. At Cranwell the zone would have had a major impact on the Cranwell Coningsby gap which low-level operators used to transit below the two MATZ stubs.
I suppose one could theoretically impose a planning regime which says that all based operators have to co-ordinate their movements with the Reds' practices, and vice versa, but all it needs is for an aircraft to delay due to an unforseen technical issue; an ATC clearance delay on international flights; or a short notice tasking - which I grant is unlikely to be often in the reconnaisance / intel world, and the whole shebang falls apart.
There were very good reasons for the Reds to have been based at Little Rissington, Kemble; Scampton; Cranwell was a mistake; and back to Scampton. Isolation. They are incompatible with shared use of an airfield. Even whilst at Cranwell they used R313 overhead Scampton and were still a problem to Cranwell's operations. Cranwell was a staff officer's abberation which is why they went back to Scampton. So what is needed is an airfield with hangarage; admin facilities;and a usable runway with ready access to a chunk of airspace 10 miles diameter and 10,000' high. AFter that until the RAF announce the new location, its anybody's guess.
I suppose one could theoretically impose a planning regime which says that all based operators have to co-ordinate their movements with the Reds' practices, and vice versa, but all it needs is for an aircraft to delay due to an unforseen technical issue; an ATC clearance delay on international flights; or a short notice tasking - which I grant is unlikely to be often in the reconnaisance / intel world, and the whole shebang falls apart.
There were very good reasons for the Reds to have been based at Little Rissington, Kemble; Scampton; Cranwell was a mistake; and back to Scampton. Isolation. They are incompatible with shared use of an airfield. Even whilst at Cranwell they used R313 overhead Scampton and were still a problem to Cranwell's operations. Cranwell was a staff officer's abberation which is why they went back to Scampton. So what is needed is an airfield with hangarage; admin facilities;and a usable runway with ready access to a chunk of airspace 10 miles diameter and 10,000' high. AFter that until the RAF announce the new location, its anybody's guess.
They can call it what they want
BUT ITS NOT A PROPER LIGHTNING
BUT ITS NOT A PROPER LIGHTNING
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The sky
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Unfortunately your plan may have worked several decades ago, not so anymore. Part of the reason Wittering was reactivated was the (modern day) capacity limits of Cranwell and Barkston.C24 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:07 pmCottesmore was in use 12 months ago. viewtopic.php?f=62&t=154074
And in May this year if I remember correctly. There was a C17 at Wittering at night making low approaches over the A1 a few months ago.
The Grobs could stay at Wittering and operate using Barkston during the day in a similar fashion to the Chipmunks based at Linton using Dishforth, leaving Linton free for JPs during the day.
Will the economy be able to sustain such a luxury as the RAFAT?
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The sky
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Basically...
SCAMPTON!
Unfortunately the RAF know this, but the beans counters do not.
- roughcutter
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:47 pm
- Location: Widnes, Cheshire
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
I'd have thought Leeming as the ideal home for the Reds, plenty of hangar space/HAS's, it's a Hawk T.1 base so there's infrastructure/logistics. And now that Lintons gone there's shedloads of airspace out there?
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
If Corybn gets in he promised to keep Scampton open, dream on!!!
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
You may well be right but I can envisage issues with Teesside ( Durham Tees Valley) and Newcastle traffic being affected by the restricted zone, plus Leeming already has dramas with noise sensitive settlements like Bedale, so god knows what they would make of the Reds ...........roughcutter wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:40 pmI'd have thought Leeming as the ideal home for the Reds, plenty of hangar space/HAS's, it's a Hawk T.1 base so there's infrastructure/logistics. And now that Lintons gone there's shedloads of airspace out there?
They can call it what they want
BUT ITS NOT A PROPER LIGHTNING
BUT ITS NOT A PROPER LIGHTNING
- reheat module
- Posts: 2906
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Often UK
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
See the point above re A1 roads, congestion, rubber necking and potential for accidents.roughcutter wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:40 pmI'd have thought Leeming as the ideal home for the Reds, plenty of hangar space/HAS's, it's a Hawk T.1 base so there's infrastructure/logistics. And now that Lintons gone there's shedloads of airspace out there?
That's the kiss of death on that then...
UK ONS CPI Rate checker for Sept every year...
- roughcutter
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:47 pm
- Location: Widnes, Cheshire
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
True enough, but they don't necessarily have to practise over the base, surely the team can transit to a designated training area?SPERX wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 6:36 pmYou may well be right but I can envisage issues with Teesside ( Durham Tees Valley) and Newcastle traffic being affected by the restricted zone, plus Leeming already has dramas with noise sensitive settlements like Bedale, so god knows what they would make of the Reds ...........roughcutter wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 5:40 pmI'd have thought Leeming as the ideal home for the Reds, plenty of hangar space/HAS's, it's a Hawk T.1 base so there's infrastructure/logistics. And now that Lintons gone there's shedloads of airspace out there?
- roughcutter
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:47 pm
- Location: Widnes, Cheshire
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Having said that, the Hawks are getting a bit long in the tooth. So I would be more concerned about replacing the aircraft (or in a worse case scenario, would the Hawks even be replaced or would the Reds be disbanded when Scampton closes . That would make the bean counters rejoice ).
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The sky
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Only very few of them. As often argued, the Reds are arguably very good value for money as both a flying advert for UK plc and a better recruitment tool than paying for some adverts to appear during BGT.
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Spot on Colin.ColintheCaterpillar wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 7:11 pmOnly very few of them. As often argued, the Reds are arguably very good value for money as both a flying advert for UK plc and a better recruitment tool than paying for some adverts to appear during BGT.
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Wasn't Boscombe Down in the frame a few years ago?. The movements there are not exactly prolific and the "Reds"could be co-ordinated with base operations fairly easily I would assume!. Also Boscombe's location could afford them the relative airspace required for ops!
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The sky
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Sadly I fear any Southern location is always going to be under a much bigger threat from civilian airspace expansion.CHINOOKER wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 8:35 pmWasn't Boscombe Down in the frame a few years ago?. The movements there are not exactly prolific and the "Reds"could be co-ordinated with base operations fairly easily I would assume!. Also Boscombe's location could afford them the relative airspace required for ops!
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
"Sadly I fear any Southern location is always going to be under a much bigger threat from civilian airspace expansion."
Macrahanish?
ha ha.
Macrahanish?
ha ha.
In this world there's two kinds of people, my friend. Those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig.
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
I have been told that there is some doubt about its suitability for residential property, due to contamination over the years. How accurate that is, I have no idea. I can't imagine it could be widespread throughout the whole site?Arthur Tee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:49 pmSo we're expecting the MoD to hang on to a piece of prime real estate - just to keep the airspce above it?ColintheCaterpillar wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:55 am
I think short term, Scampton will remain as the practice area - people have to remember that the "danger area" they practice in is a 5 mile radius up to 9,000 or 10,000ft. Yes, fire and emergency cover would be required, as would ATC, but importantly the airfield itself would not require upkeep to the same extent now; that's a cost saving until it is disposed of. Cottesmore could possiby also be an option.
When Scampton is sold - the houses willup within days - and the airspace will be gone!
Arthur
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The sky
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
pb643 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 05, 2019 10:47 amI have been told that there is some doubt about its suitability for residential property, due to contamination over the years. How accurate that is, I have no idea. I can't imagine it could be widespread throughout the whole site?Arthur Tee wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 12:49 pmSo we're expecting the MoD to hang on to a piece of prime real estate - just to keep the airspce above it?ColintheCaterpillar wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 10:55 am
I think short term, Scampton will remain as the practice area - people have to remember that the "danger area" they practice in is a 5 mile radius up to 9,000 or 10,000ft. Yes, fire and emergency cover would be required, as would ATC, but importantly the airfield itself would not require upkeep to the same extent now; that's a cost saving until it is disposed of. Cottesmore could possiby also be an option.
When Scampton is sold - the houses willup within days - and the airspace will be gone!
Arthur
I think the short term plan just avoids paying for the site’s upkeep. That’s a substantial saving without even marketing it.
- The Phantom
- Posts: 3681
- Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:16 pm
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Yes - a frightening thought!David Vincent wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2019 4:09 pmThe other thing to consider is the impact of Jeremy Corbyn becoming PM in a few weeks from now, I doubt the Reds will see out his premiership so re-basing would cease to be a problem.
Re: Red Arrows New Base?
Believe they only have enough spare Hawks to last to 2030
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Evergreen 44, twocee and 94 guests