Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Trained Pilots-No Planes

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
Post Reply
Snoop 95
Posts: 1900
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: West Suffolk

Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Snoop 95 » Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:35 am

This is a BBC article from March 2019, so if it has been posted before-my apologies. However, it is very disturbing if the situation has not changed since then.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47420698

Bucky P
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:43 am
Location: Oxfordshire UK.

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Bucky P » Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:51 am

Should have been kept in house instead of contracting out! Privatisation costs considerably more and reduces overall control and efficiency!

User avatar
reheat module
Posts: 2910
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Often UK

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by reheat module » Sun Jun 16, 2019 11:47 am

Sadly it's not new news to be published.
The training mechanism is broken.
UK ONS CPI Rate checker for Sept every year... :whistle:

User avatar
Richard B
Moderator
Posts: 4924
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Richard B » Sun Jun 16, 2019 12:21 pm

So what happened to the Hundreds of Tornado pilots plus the Harrier and Jaguar to name a few.
The amount of highly skilled and combat experienced pilots lost over the last 10 years is a national scandal.
See Babcock have there fingers in the pie,same firm doing HS2.
You can see where this will end up.

Bucky P
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:43 am
Location: Oxfordshire UK.

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Bucky P » Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:01 pm

I wonder how many ministers have investment interests in Babcock?
Last edited by Bucky P on Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:25 am

Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:01 pm
I wonder how many ministers have investment interests in Sed Babcock?
Think the company is called just Babcock, not Sed? Babcock.
Last edited by Agent K on Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 am

Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:51 am
Should have been kept in house instead of contracting out! Privatisation costs considerably more and reduces overall control and efficiency!
It’s all about cash flow and fixed costs rather than overall cost saving though. If you can spread your spend over, say, 25 years rather than paying most up front then that might be very attractive.

User avatar
big john
Posts: 7437
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 9:53 am
Location: EGLL

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by big john » Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:03 am

Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:01 pm
I wonder how many ministers have investment interests in Sed Babcock?
If you really want know, you can download the register of MP's finacial interests :- https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/c ... ts1719.htm
Something to keep you quiet on a rainy day. :roll:
rgds
BJ
Always Watching: Always Listening
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

Phoon
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Phoon » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:58 pm

Agent K wrote:
Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 am
Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:51 am
Should have been kept in house instead of contracting out! Privatisation costs considerably more and reduces overall control and efficiency!
It’s all about cash flow and fixed costs rather than overall cost saving though. If you can spread your spend over, say, 25 years rather than paying most up front then that might be very attractive.
But end up paying for said asset 3 or 4 times over what you would have done had you paid for it up front. And in some cases never own it.

Phoon
Posts: 463
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:50 pm

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Phoon » Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:59 pm

Richard B wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 12:21 pm
So what happened to the Hundreds of Tornado pilots plus the Harrier and Jaguar to name a few.
The amount of highly skilled and combat experienced pilots lost over the last 10 years is a national scandal.
See Babcock have there fingers in the pie,same firm doing HS2.
You can see where this will end up.
Now flying for Easyjet / Virgin Atlantic / BA etc......

User avatar
Fighterfoto
Posts: 686
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:01 pm

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Fighterfoto » Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:22 pm

There have always been Holding Officers and always will be. The majority of the current pool of holdies will have been cleared in a couple of years. The current training pipeline was designed for SDSR12 which saw a much reduced throughput of trainees. This changed with SDSR15 which increased demand which is now being resolved, in part with some temporary outsourcing of training. There is however no shortage of pilots on the frontline and the Ex-Tornado pilots have been absorbed elsewhere.
Never trust a grown man with a nickname

User avatar
wolfie138
Posts: 480
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:51 pm

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by wolfie138 » Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:28 am

why can the jets not be flown over water?

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:03 am

wolfie138 wrote:
Tue Jun 18, 2019 8:28 am
why can the jets not be flown over water?
It’s not the jets, it’s the propeller (turboprop) T6’s that had issues with certification of the life preservation gear I believe.

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Tue Jun 18, 2019 9:04 am

Phoon wrote:
Mon Jun 17, 2019 1:58 pm
Agent K wrote:
Mon Jun 17, 2019 7:27 am
Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:51 am
Should have been kept in house instead of contracting out! Privatisation costs considerably more and reduces overall control and efficiency!
It’s all about cash flow and fixed costs rather than overall cost saving though. If you can spread your spend over, say, 25 years rather than paying most up front then that might be very attractive.
But end up paying for said asset 3 or 4 times over what you would have done had you paid for it up front. And in some cases never own it.
Agreed you pay more, but it means you don’t need that money up front, as I say, it’s a cash flow thing.

ColintheCaterpillar
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The sky

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by ColintheCaterpillar » Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:10 pm

Snoop 95 wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:35 am
This is a BBC article from March 2019, so if it has been posted before-my apologies. However, it is very disturbing if the situation has not changed since then.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-47420698
Training systems go through cycles. It will take years to clear any backlog. There won’t be any immediate visible change. You can’t just magic up more airfields, aircraft, days in the week and - most importantly - instructors.
Bucky P wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 8:51 am
Should have been kept in house instead of contracting out! Privatisation costs considerably more and reduces overall control and efficiency!
Sadly the National Audit Office suggested in around 2000 that military flying training was inefficient (it always has had natural peaks and troughs, fallow periods and surges). “PFI everything” fans Blair and Brown were straight on board.

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:51 am

ColintheCaterpillar wrote:
Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:10 pm
[Sadly the National Audit Office suggested in around 2000 that military flying training was inefficient (it always has had natural peaks and troughs, fallow periods and surges). “PFI everything” fans Blair and Brown were straight on board.
The training was excellent, no doubt about that, but, came at a heavy price, and didn't optimise efficiency, and when both infrastructure and fleets (all of them - Helos, Primary, Tucano, Hawk T1, Dominie/King Air) needed upgrading. The money was not there for all that up front cost (I'm not saying that's a good or bad thing, just stating facts) hence fix that cost and sp[read that cost through PFI. As always with these things, contracts, and writing, and framework and management of them are key, and make or break such initiatives.
Last edited by Agent K on Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Doughnut
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 10:21 am

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Doughnut » Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:51 am

PFI contracts signed years ago worked for the government and the MOD requirements at the time they were signed.
Sadly they can not react quickly to changed requirements without massive extra costs being incurred by the MOD.
The PFI can not (or will not) amend the contract to increase or decrease the service being provided.
What bugs me is when a PFI deal comes to and end the Contractor walks away all the assets and can resell them on the open market, assets which have been paid for by MOD.
Would be interesting to know how much has been made from the sale of Grob 115 to Finland, the Cranwell King Air's and Shawbury Squirrel's and Griffon's on the civil market ?

Agent K
Posts: 1267
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by Agent K » Wed Jun 19, 2019 12:18 pm

Unless, of course, you write the contract whereupon on termination you end up owning the assets, which of course would then require the additional costs of depreciation to be built in over the lifetime of the contract. Swings and roundabouts.

They can react to changed requirements (of course at a cost) if the contract is written well in the first place and allows Change Orders for additional or changed requirements.

ColintheCaterpillar
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 11:23 pm
Location: The sky

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by ColintheCaterpillar » Sun Jun 23, 2019 8:02 am

Agent K wrote:
Wed Jun 19, 2019 10:51 am
ColintheCaterpillar wrote:
Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:10 pm
[Sadly the National Audit Office suggested in around 2000 that military flying training was inefficient (it always has had natural peaks and troughs, fallow periods and surges). “PFI everything” fans Blair and Brown were straight on board.
The training was excellent, no doubt about that, but, came at a heavy price, and didn't optimise efficiency, and when both infrastructure and fleets (all of them - Helos, Primary, Tucano, Hawk T1, Dominie/King Air) needed upgrading. The money was not there for all that up front cost (I'm not saying that's a good or bad thing, just stating facts) hence fix that cost and sp[read that cost through PFI. As always with these things, contracts, and writing, and framework and management of them are key, and make or break such initiatives.
All true.

Sadly we didn’t have a very good crystal ball, or the ability to surge (or effectively double the capacity of the system!). We also may well have been very miserly in our specification of actual flying that could take place. Maybe with hindsight, the MFTS PFI would have been better limited to provision of infra and aeroplanes on the line, as opposed to the all encompassing system we’ve been given.

User avatar
toom317
Posts: 1943
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:31 pm

Re: Trained Pilots-No Planes

Post by toom317 » Sun Jun 23, 2019 9:24 am

Doughnut wrote:
Wed Jun 19, 2019 11:51 am
What bugs me is when a PFI deal comes to and end the Contractor walks away all the assets and can resell them on the open market, assets which have been paid for by MOD./quote]

I'm not a fan of these PFI's, but these assets haven't been paid for by the Mod. The aircraft were bought by the company supplying the contract, they are responsible for the maintenance and running costs of the contract, the MoD just rents the assets from them.
No one gets out of life alive.



Equipment: Camera, Lens, Goretex Y fronts

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: davegard, Majestic-12 [Bot], Tom B and 77 guests