Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

F35 noise protest

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
bentwaters81tfw
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:43 pm

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by bentwaters81tfw » Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:25 pm

romeo bravo wrote:
turmo wrote:Well, have you ever noticed how RAF airfields are named after the nearest postal village?
Actually its after the nearest village with a church :whistle:
A village without a church is a hamlet. :P

Snoop 95
Posts: 1900
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:17 pm
Location: West Suffolk

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by Snoop 95 » Sun Mar 25, 2018 9:36 am

Was there ever a village called Bentwaters then? I thought it was just a row of cottages and no church!

User avatar
Nighthawke
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:04 pm

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by Nighthawke » Sun Mar 25, 2018 1:08 pm

Bentwaters was originally named RAF Butley when construction began but renamed after Bentwaters Cottages which used to stand where the main runway was built.

User avatar
effects
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 10:21 pm
Location: 1 mile N of 06 Farnborough

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by effects » Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:33 pm

seven wrote:F-35's are most definitely louder than a Victor. Different sound if that makes sense, but most definitely louder!

7
I just cannot believe that.

User avatar
seven
Posts: 3279
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 7:37 pm

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by seven » Sun Mar 25, 2018 11:45 pm

Fine by me :thumbs:

7
#KeepFightingMichael #banthebulls

Supra
Posts: 2725
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by Supra » Mon Mar 26, 2018 11:29 am

Noise per se' is subject to the recipient's audible perception. One person may consider a sound to be loud & another adjacent person be comfortable with it. A third basic Category is persons who 'whine' about any noise they don't want, be it once a year music events or jets!....Clearly, aircraft 'loudness' is linked to the 'type' of noise, location of generated noise-vs-receiving ear/instrument, general volume, frequency, pitch, local topography, presence of reflectors/absorption, ambient temperature, air pressure/density, moisture content & the performance of the recipient's ears!
The more scientific version is:-
a) In acoustics, loudness is the subjective perception of sound pressure. More formally, it is defined as, "That attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which sounds can be ordered on a scale extending from quiet to loud."
b) Loudness depends on the amplitude of the sound wave. The larger the amplitude the more energy the sound wave contains therefore the louder the sound. it also depend on it's frequency and the pitch of sound.
c) Pitch and loudness may occasionally appear similar but they are not exactly the same. They differ on the basis of their tone quality. The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency while loudness of a sound depends on the amplitude of sound waves.
d) Sound loudness is a subjective term describing the strength of the ear's perception of a sound. It is intimately related to sound intensity but can by no means be considered identical to intensity. The sound intensity must be factored by the ear's sensitivity to the particular frequencies contained in the sound.
You can see the subject of 'loudness' is so subjective, no 2 people can ever agree on the same day at the same location much less historically! ;) Regards, Professor Beaker.
PS:- Why did they call RAF..................................... Oh ! never mind.

User avatar
ChrisCwmbran
Posts: 990
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 11:30 am
Location: South Wales

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by ChrisCwmbran » Mon Mar 26, 2018 12:50 pm

Certainly I know from experience having lived in Carterton that although the A400Ms are scientifically quieter than the older generation aircraft that were based at Brize, the noise is actually much more distinctive and noticeable.

User avatar
C24
Posts: 3196
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 10:52 am
Location: In the 51st State of the Union

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by C24 » Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:37 am

Just for interest

Quite some years back the Manor House at Barnack, which is on the extended centreline of RAF Wittering was up for sale and after some time the new owners were given a large grant to install double glazing.

Villagers around RAF Cottesmore have also been assisted to double glaze their property.

Neither airfield now presents a noise hazard.

It seems that that the third runway for Heathrow is moving into the construction phase. This raises in my mind two questions;

Should perfectly good houses be destroyed when there is a current lack of housing?

Why are buildings under the flight path unable to receive money to protect the occupants from noise pollution?
C24.
493d/48th - Grim Reapers Supporter.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/charlie-two-four/ FuzzyFastjetFotos, incorporating "HazyHelos"
There's no "go-round" in a glider.

User avatar
Hornet
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:44 pm

Re: F35 noise protest

Post by Hornet » Fri Apr 06, 2018 7:36 pm

USMC F-35B Takeoff at RIAT was awsome
Lightning=Thunder!

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], TH1213 and 36 guests