Like I said, silly question that has popped into my head!

Indeed, that's how I know the F3 is the fastest at low level (faster than F-15s, F-111s, B-1s etc) and very competitive at higher levels.gamecock wrote:Probably because nobody on here has any idea!Sounds like a question for PPrune.
Not sure comparing an F3 to a B1, i.e. a fighter to a strategic bomber is really proving anything? I'm led to believe also that the F3 was less than competitive at higher levels.page_verify wrote:Indeed, that's how I know the F3 is the fastest at low level (faster than F-15s, F-111s, B-1s etc) and very competitive at higher levels.gamecock wrote:Probably because nobody on here has any idea!Sounds like a question for PPrune.
http://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-102450.html
I stand to be corrected but I thought the B1B was subsonic at low levels, only supersonic (just) at higher altitude. The B1A which never reached production was proposed to be faster.page_verify wrote:Pure low level speed, the B-1B was also meant to be capable of supersonic speeds a low level.
Users browsing this forum: Matty82, np1991, welshdan1927 and 42 guests