Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Police Helicopter crash

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
ArabJazzie
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:11 am

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by ArabJazzie » Tue Dec 03, 2013 1:00 pm

Are we feeling ok Jem! We agree with each other on something!!!

Im not sure about this one as there are too many things that dont add up for me!
Arabest,
Geoff.

User avatar
Thunder
Posts: 5294
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Thunder » Tue Dec 03, 2013 3:46 pm

Not meaning to be disrespectful to anyone here but one of the problems that the Police/AAIB are going to have is reliable witnesses. This happened on a Friday night where a lot of the witnesses were pub goers . Not saying they were all drunk far from it(and it doesn't matter if they were) but even a couple drinks alters how the mind and eyes work.

Like Geoff said before it's surprising how quite the EC-135 is, we get the Air Ambulance into my work all the time and half the time you don't even realise it's in. One of the reasons that many Police Forces around the World selected it.

User avatar
Tooks
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:15 pm
Location: Lincolnshireville

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Tooks » Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:37 am

ArabJazzie wrote:
RichC wrote:There is talk on Pprune, by pilots of the type (and others) that this could have been a gearbox failure or drive shaft problem, hence the no rotation of the rotors on impact, quite similar to the North Sea/Shetland incidents whereby the rotors literally stop in flight....and it falls like a brick (which was an account from one witness). But even they, who fly them everyday are speculating. Let's just wait a year and find out then. Then we'll know for sure.
Any similarities to recent North Sea accidents should be ignored!!! Only one was a catastrophic gearbox failure, 2 were precautionary due to indication lights and the most recent, last i looked anyway, was looking like pilot error! However, the final report is still to come.
ChrisGlobe wrote:No CVR, no AFDR, etc. Going to be a difficult one for AAIB, this.


As the AAIB have a complete airframe to sift through, this will be very easy for them to find the issue. You would be surprised what little evidence they have used in the past to meet their conclusions. And considering this is a Police helicopter, im sure the cameras would still have been rolling.

Arabest,
Geoff
It's common practice during transits, and I believe this heli was near to returning to base, to have the very expensive camera in the stowed position to protect it from FOD etc during landing. It may already have been stowed as part of the landing preparations.

It would still have been recording though, so may still yield some useful info.

What seems clear is that this was not a controlled autorotation landing, however hard, so whatever happened was sudden and left the pilot with few options.

User avatar
Thunder
Posts: 5294
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:24 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Thunder » Wed Dec 04, 2013 3:45 pm

Tooks wrote: What seems clear is that this was not a controlled autorotation landing, however hard, so whatever happened was sudden and left the pilot with few options.
How can you be so sure?

User avatar
Mike
Posts: 22760
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Mike » Wed Dec 04, 2013 4:06 pm

It simply fell out of the sky, the main rotor wasn't turning and the pilot could do nothing about it.

What a dreadful way to go. :(

User avatar
Tooks
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:15 pm
Location: Lincolnshireville

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Tooks » Wed Dec 04, 2013 6:10 pm

Thunder wrote:
Tooks wrote: What seems clear is that this was not a controlled autorotation landing, however hard, so whatever happened was sudden and left the pilot with few options.
How can you be so sure?
Well, obviously I can't be 100%, but as above the lack of rotor damage strongly suggests the blades weren't turning. If as some in the media have suggested, it was a successful autorotation onto a roof which then collapsed after the rotors had been stopped, then I'd have expected the crew to be walking wounded at worst.

Having seen the pictures of the damage, it looks to me more like that consistent with a big fall onto something that gave a little, ie the roof.

Even if it was an autorotation to 30-40ft short, it still looks too badly damaged.

I hope they find out what happened soon.

ArabJazzie
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:11 am

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by ArabJazzie » Mon Dec 09, 2013 5:25 pm

jem60 wrote:Hmmm. According to latest Sky News broadcast, the AAIB have found no evidence of engine or gearbox failure, stating though that the rotors, both main and tail, show no evidence of rotation at impact. Interesting.............
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/spe ... g_spao.cfm

Special bulletin has been released.

Cant read too much into it at the minute.
Arabest,
Geoff.

User avatar
wolfie138
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:51 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by wolfie138 » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:36 am

can one of you more knowledgeable bods enlighten me on this : most things are saying that the rotors weren't turning at the point of impact, and indeed on the way down either. what i can't understand, is why? if the engine quit (or whatever caused it), wouldn't the weight of the blades and the fact they were spinning at x-hundred RPM, or whatever it is, mean they'd continue spinning for some time? if the blades stopped DEAD, wouldn't that cause some major structural damage to the blades or bearings, maybe even shearing them off?

ArabJazzie
Posts: 1422
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:11 am

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by ArabJazzie » Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:19 pm

Used to work on fixed wing stuff so might not be right, but i understand a helicopter still requires a fair bit of forward airspeed to keep the rotors turning to arrest the decent enough when autorotating.

As to breaking off, the blades on helicopters are quite substantial and their weight would keep them turning until the drag took over and slowed them down, quite quickly.
Arabest,
Geoff.

User avatar
Tooks
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:15 pm
Location: Lincolnshireville

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Tooks » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:50 am

Well, each blade is a wing, and like any wing it can stall.

With no power to the rotor, a high collective position, a high angle of attack of the rotor disc, and free fall, it wouldn't take very long for the rotor to stop. Maybe just a few seconds.

Although not a helicopter pilot myself, I work with many people who are, and I'm told that one pretty standard part of any auto following total power failure is to lower the collective to preserve rotor rpm, and indeed descent can be turned into more rotor rpm via a sort of windmill effect that will speed up the rotor and that energy can then be used to flare the landing.

I've probably not explained that very well, and obviously it's a complex process. Auto's are practiced often by heli pilots, but only to a hover and not usually at night. Obviously, performing them to the ground is likely to damage the aircraft, and at the end of the day it's an emergency procedure and is not guaranteed to work due to all the variables and nature of a given emergency a pilot is trying to deal with.

One thing you do need for a successful auto landing though is forward speed, if anything happens whilst in the hover at low level, then it's difficult to recover from, and there is the risk of using up all your stored energy in an auto and flaring too high or short of your landing point particularly at night or in poor visibility.

User avatar
wolfie138
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2013 1:51 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by wolfie138 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:46 am

cheers, i was thinking the inertia of those blades spinning would take a fair while to slow - they certainly seem to on a normal landing.
"indeed descent can be turned into more rotor rpm via a sort of windmill effect that will speed up the rotor and that energy can then be used to flare the landing." that was what i was trying to say about autorotation but as you've pointed out forward speed is also needed.

User avatar
andygoole
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:45 pm
Location: Howden, East Yorkshire

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by andygoole » Thu Dec 12, 2013 1:32 pm

EC 135 helicopters grounded by Bond Air Services

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-g ... t-25353001
Image
Scanning Humber Region
Uniden UBC3500XLT
Uniden UBC75XLT
Realistic Pro-2006
Alinco DJ-X3e
Watson W-881 and WMSA-889
Homebrew Bowtie

LM47
Posts: 469
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:35 am
Location: Dunoon,Argyll.

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by LM47 » Thu Dec 12, 2013 5:09 pm

BBC Radio Scotland reports ban now lifted and 1aircraft flying from Glasgow heliport half an hour ago.
Sadly also reporting a 10th person has died.
RG

User avatar
Reptile 1
Posts: 1708
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:57 pm
Location: Here and there.

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Reptile 1 » Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:29 pm

More will no doubt follow

BBC Breaking News
A police helicopter which crashed on a busy pub in Glasgow last November suffered a double engine failure, apparently as a result of a fuel supply problem, investigators have found.

The Air Accidents Investigation Branch said the cause of the problem was still not clear.

But it said the fuel pumps appeared to be working and there was no evidence of fuel lines being blocked or of a fuel leak.

opsjockey

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by opsjockey » Fri Feb 14, 2014 3:55 pm

Thought this was a military forum. Police Helicopters are civvie.. rule 8 of the Forum Rules states Military or Government which are pseudo military. This is neither. Nice how the moderators change the Forum Rules to suit, no point having rules really.....

keldsyke
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:10 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by keldsyke » Fri Feb 14, 2014 4:11 pm

opsjockey wrote:Thought this was a military forum. Police Helicopters are civvie.. rule 8 of the Forum Rules states Military or Government which are pseudo military. This is neither. Nice how the moderators change the Forum Rules to suit, no point having rules really.....
Some people really need to get a life, if that's all you have to worry about with what's going off in the world you're doing well

opsjockey

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by opsjockey » Fri Feb 14, 2014 4:15 pm

yup, its all I have to worry about! point is, why publish forum rules if they dont apply. I might go and post the entire movements for gatwick in the heads up... its the principle. anyway, I have no wish to debate. thread reported.

User avatar
Richard B
Moderator
Posts: 4927
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Richard B » Fri Feb 14, 2014 7:53 pm

Think you will find that the police are part of our forces in some respect, also Goverment UK tax owned.

Dan213
Posts: 554
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:04 pm

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by Dan213 » Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:08 pm

Richard B wrote:Think you will find that the police are part of our forces in some respect, also Goverment UK tax owned.
Yep, as far as I was aware Police, Coastguard and so on is all aallowed on FC

Sent from my GT-I8160 using Tapatalk

opsjockey

Re: Police Helicopter crash

Post by opsjockey » Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:27 pm

police maybe government owned but are not pseudo military. rule 8

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amp, Dean.E, Ellins, F1inshot, FFDspotter, Geordie Exile, jakdaw, Pauld339, SpilsbyPete, Thommo60, trotsenstein, Wits and 38 guests