Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

RAF MILDENHALL

A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
Post Reply
Weazel69
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:51 am
Location: North Norfolk

RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Weazel69 » Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:34 pm

Just heard on the BBC - Look East News
RAF MILDENHALL is to get a load of rework done, owing to its strategic placement for both th UK & EUROPE :thumbs:

There is life in the Old Base after all :clap: :thumbs: :thumb:
forewarned is forearmed

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1777
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by XWP29 » Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:46 pm

Weazel69 wrote:
Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:34 pm
Just heard on the BBC - Look East News
RAF MILDENHALL is to get a load of rework done, owing to its strategic placement for both th UK & EUROPE :thumbs:

There is life in the Old Base after all :clap: :thumbs: :thumb:
Announced in June?
https://www.mildenhall.af.mil/News/Pres ... contracts/

EAGLE
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2021 4:15 pm
Location: Diss, Norfolk

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by EAGLE » Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:08 pm

XWP29 wrote:
Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:46 pm
Weazel69 wrote:
Wed Nov 09, 2022 7:34 pm
Just heard on the BBC - Look East News
RAF MILDENHALL is to get a load of rework done, owing to its strategic placement for both th UK & EUROPE :thumbs:

There is life in the Old Base after all :clap: :thumbs: :thumb:
Announced in June?
https://www.mildenhall.af.mil/News/Pres ... contracts/
Having listened to the part that was broadcast, it does sound to me like something different to the above link. That sounds just like a generic release to say "we've got some UK based facility maintainence teams now so can get repairs done quicker"

BBC Look East said
"Plans for upgrading a US Air base in Suffolk have been revealed. RAF Mildenhall was due to close back in 2015. There will now be new investment at the site which is seen as an important part of American and European defence."
Proud supporter of airplanes.live! Info athttps://airplanes.live

POL
Posts: 16963
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by POL » Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:49 am

There's no new stories on DVIDS about Mildenhall...

Vulture 01
Posts: 503
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Vulture 01 » Thu Nov 10, 2022 3:14 pm

Just remember that, the RAF at least, has a long history of spending money on bases then closing them down.

User avatar
Tiger 1
Posts: 3132
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:25 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Tiger 1 » Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:27 pm

RAF Bawtry and RAF Finningley... in both cases vasts amount of money spent updating with new buildings and repairs undertaken to then be closed.

T1

Unknown74
Posts: 4151
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:13 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Unknown74 » Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:52 pm

Is that not the normal MoD/ RAF proceedure, refurbish Airfield, relay Runway etc, then close the place! 🤬

User avatar
Professor_M
Posts: 1261
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2022 7:07 am

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Professor_M » Thu Nov 10, 2022 10:08 pm

Unknown74 wrote:
Thu Nov 10, 2022 8:52 pm
Is that not the normal MoD/ RAF proceedure, refurbish Airfield, relay Runway etc, then close the place! 🤬
Waddington and Lossiemouth are yet to close - perhaps it's not always the case.

Supra
Posts: 2865
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Supra » Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:48 am

True enough for Waddo' & Lossie', but USAFE RAF Alconbury was a classic case of massive spending on the Airside & Domestic Sites. Multiple new hardstands, increased aprons, etc. New PX (Base Exchange?), New Gym, etc.... Entire Base closure before the contracts were signed-of! :roll: :'(

User avatar
James Cutting
Posts: 5021
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:12 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by James Cutting » Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:06 am

Vulture 01 wrote:
Thu Nov 10, 2022 3:14 pm
Just remember that, the RAF at least, has a long history of spending money on bases then closing them down.
But surely it won't be the RAF funding it, they lease it to the USAF so surely it'll be funded by the Americans.

We can't always have a Debbie Downer when there's some good news!
"Grim Reapers Supporter"

Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/99536938@N06/

skidrow
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by skidrow » Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:40 am

These are just maintenance contracts not new construction or redevelopment and has been standard practice for many years at both bases.

Philwinward
Posts: 376
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 12:05 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Philwinward » Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:02 pm

I believe that when the USAF left Bentwaters just after the runway had been resurfaced/repaired they said that NATO paid for the work !

skidrow
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:51 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by skidrow » Fri Nov 11, 2022 12:24 pm

NATO funding is all subject to the base mission. Lakenheath gets a lot of NATO funding whereas Mildenhall gets less as it supports other operations as well.

User avatar
XWP29
Posts: 1777
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:52 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by XWP29 » Sat Nov 12, 2022 7:00 pm

James Cutting wrote:
Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:06 am
Vulture 01 wrote:
Thu Nov 10, 2022 3:14 pm
Just remember that, the RAF at least, has a long history of spending money on bases then closing them down.
But surely it won't be the RAF funding it, they lease it to the USAF so surely it'll be funded by the Americans.

We can't always have a Debbie Downer when there's some good news!
Who’s DD James 🤔🤣

User avatar
Nighthawke
Posts: 6295
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:04 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Nighthawke » Sat Nov 12, 2022 7:10 pm

A ficticious character. Usually applied to someone who puts a "downer" on good news story. This might explain further (other links available I'm sure):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Downer

reaperops
Posts: 836
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:12 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by reaperops » Sat Nov 12, 2022 11:59 pm

Bit of a non-story really. Following the reversal of the 2015 closure, certain aspects of the infrastructure are in need of TLC. There was a media muster which described maintenance contracts have been awarded to local and national contractors to bring RAFM up to a reasonable operational standard.
Here we go........ The Devils Knockin' at my door!

Weazel69
Posts: 1098
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:51 am
Location: North Norfolk

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Weazel69 » Sun Nov 13, 2022 11:32 am

reaperops wrote:
Sat Nov 12, 2022 11:59 pm
Bit of a non-story really. Following the reversal of the 2015 closure, certain aspects of the infrastructure are in need of TLC. There was a media muster which described maintenance contracts have been awarded to local and national contractors to bring RAFM up to a reasonable operational standard.
YOU are Right!! - I don't know why I Bothered :grr: :grr: :grr:
forewarned is forearmed

Supra
Posts: 2865
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:01 pm

Re: RAF MILDENHALL

Post by Supra » Sun Nov 13, 2022 1:02 pm

James Cutting wrote:
Fri Nov 11, 2022 11:06 am
Vulture 01 wrote:
Thu Nov 10, 2022 3:14 pm
Just remember that, the RAF at least, has a long history of spending money on bases then closing them down.
But surely it won't be the RAF funding it, they lease it to the USAF so surely it'll be funded by the Americans.

We can't always have a Debbie Downer when there's some good news!
Can't pretend to understand the finer issues of the UK. financing improvement works on USAF tenanted Bases within England. Recently came across this extract posted in this Forum regarding RAF Fairford....

Major upgrades to RAF Fairford's airfield runway and other facilities, totalling more than £24m, have been completed. The Gloucestershire airbase got the makeover as part of an initiative to improve the base's support capabilities for the US Air Force (USAF) and will see further upgrades as part of a national programme.
The funding for this upgrade to less than one mile of runway comes from the Ministry of Defence's £117m United States Visiting Forces (USVF) infrastructure project, which aims to improve operations capabilities at UK airbases used by the USAF - who have had military bases in the UK since World War Two and the birth of the US-UK special relationship.


Whilst you're correct in saying the RAF surely won't fund Mildenhall's construction works, it would appear the MOD. could well pay for it? That said, the complete scabby Local Rag article extracted above also refers to 'Runway' extensions that are currently non existent! :roll:

Post Reply

Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 72 guests