Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
I was just wondering about the range of an F15C/D could they not do it without tanker support ?, when the 57 FIS were based at Keflavik they used to make regular visits to the UK did they need tanker support each time as well, I can recall some of their flights over E Yorks but I cant recall seeing tankers with them. Can anyone enlighten me
Mtia
Mtia
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
57th FIS Eagles had FAST packs fitted
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 57905
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
- Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
I bet the F-4E came via Lossie or Leuchars
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
57 FIS used to regularly have Lossie or Leuchars as a diversion airfield. I believe two F-102s diverted into Leuchars the day before a BoB show there, and departed before the display commenced.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Said during A/R it would be only one refuelling .
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Possible, but would you want to be flying to Iceland with minimum fuel on arrival? Doesn't sound like conditions were ideal yesterday.David750 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 10:23 amI was just wondering about the range of an F15C/D could they not do it without tanker support ?, when the 57 FIS were based at Keflavik they used to make regular visits to the UK did they need tanker support each time as well, I can recall some of their flights over E Yorks but I cant recall seeing tankers with them. Can anyone enlighten me
Mtia
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
I think that the F15E would do it without a tanker support.
I believe the C has done it without tankers in past but assume it very much depends on wx and wind conditions. Also note E has larger fuel capacity than the C due to the conformal fuel tanks.
I believe the C has done it without tankers in past but assume it very much depends on wx and wind conditions. Also note E has larger fuel capacity than the C due to the conformal fuel tanks.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
My memory is that the first F-15E to come to Europe (the re-worked prototype YF-15A 71-0291) self deployed direct from Goose/Gander/St Johns? to Mildenhall/Farnborough? - i.e. nonstop with no tanker support. I don't think F-15E has HF capability (for ATC comms), and I don't know what routing was used but Skyvector gives any of those as a minimum distance (over the oggin and Eire) of 2100nm ish. If routing closer to land (Greenland/Iceland) then the distance increases to about 2300nm.
Wikipedia says F-15 ferry range is 3000nm with Fast Packs and 3 external tanks. Lakenheath to Kef is 'only' 1002nm, so even without FAST packs I'd have though an F-15C could fly Lakenheath to Kef and back again without requiring tanker support. However, a single/dual seater fighter over the North Atlantic with no support isn't a place I'd like to find myself too often.
Wikipedia says F-15 ferry range is 3000nm with Fast Packs and 3 external tanks. Lakenheath to Kef is 'only' 1002nm, so even without FAST packs I'd have though an F-15C could fly Lakenheath to Kef and back again without requiring tanker support. However, a single/dual seater fighter over the North Atlantic with no support isn't a place I'd like to find myself too often.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
They Used To Come Down To Leuchars , Often Supported By A KC-135 Calling Mogas-45
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
71-0291 flew from Loring AFB, Maine to Mildenhall with no tanker support.Malcolm wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:19 pmMy memory is that the first F-15E to come to Europe (the re-worked prototype YF-15A 71-0291) self deployed direct from Goose/Gander/St Johns? to Mildenhall/Farnborough? - i.e. nonstop with no tanker support. I don't think F-15E has HF capability (for ATC comms), and I don't know what routing was used but Skyvector gives any of those as a minimum distance (over the oggin and Eire) of 2100nm ish. If routing closer to land (Greenland/Iceland) then the distance increases to about 2300nm.
Wikipedia says F-15 ferry range is 3000nm with Fast Packs and 3 external tanks. Lakenheath to Kef is 'only' 1002nm, so even without FAST packs I'd have though an F-15C could fly Lakenheath to Kef and back again without requiring tanker support. However, a single/dual seater fighter over the North Atlantic with no support isn't a place I'd like to find myself too often.
If memory serves me correctly when 57FIS F-15C's were repainted at Kemble they flew Keflavik to Kemble direct, as singletons, with no tanker support. No tankers on the return flight either.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
As already stated, 57th FIS Eagles were fitted with FAST packs.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Here you go - a 57th FIS F-15C in 1987 fitted with FAST (Fuel and Sensor Tactical) Packs - believe these were later known as Conformal Fuel Tanks

Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Great, thanks for the replies guys and especially for the photo which shows the FAST pack
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Nice picture Daz,Knife 04 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 09, 2020 3:29 pmHere you go - a 57th FIS F-15C in 1987 fitted with FAST (Fuel and Sensor Tactical) Packs - believe these were later known as Conformal Fuel Tanks
F-15C - 80-0041 / IS - 57th FIS, Keflavik, Iceland by Darren Currie, on Flickr
I don’t think I can ever recall seeing a C with the tanks, so good to see one.

- LN Strike Eagle
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 2:33 pm
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
The Israeli F-15C/Ds that deployed to Waddington last year had them.
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
As the Trevster says, great pic, Daz 

Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
Cheers both



-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 8:10 am
Re: Re yesterdays Keflavik deployment
I suppose yes they could but what if you get there and you need to divert.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: jonnewell and 54 guests