Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

A400 Atlas spotted

Forum rules
Guildelines for the use of this section have been released, please see them here - http://www.fightercontrol.co.uk/forum/v ... 54#p690454

This notice will be left in place for a short time so that everyone is aware
User avatar
Agent K
Posts: 1362
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:50 am
Location: Nearby RAF Henlow, Bedfordshire

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by Agent K » Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:12 am

Get a life Mike, it's a hobby, it should be fun, not an anal exercise in pedantry. I never look at OTT, I safely assume something is flying OTT of somewhere at some point, it's less relevant, now to see what types are visiting what airfields in which area, now that is interesting.

Seafire 47

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by Seafire 47 » Sun Feb 08, 2015 10:23 am

The Phantom wrote:
Seafire 47 wrote:There goes another one Mike,good job!
He seems to specialise in it; yet why do the moderators do nothing about that??
Good question,I suspect our only answer will be a locked thread and a reprimand for everyone except the culprit.

Zymurgy661
Posts: 3308
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:15 am

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by Zymurgy661 » Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:11 pm

As far as i'm concerned, i see no issue with this post. As i've said in the past, this section is designed for airfield logs, serial tie ups etc. The original post was clear that the aircraft 'had' been in the circuit and had already departed. The following post provided a serial tie up as well. So, all in all, an example of a movement log - exactly what this section is designed for.

Had the original post stated 'A400 in the circut talking to tower on 123.456' followed by continual updates on what it was doing i.e. live monitoring of the aircraft, then that should have been in the Heads Up/OTT - but it wasn't so it shouldn't be.

If people have an issue with a post or thread and think its in the wrong section, then use the 'report post' button rather than posting in the thread. The moderators will then make the decision if the post is in the correct section or not.

n.b. for any pedants out there, i know 123.456 isn't a correct freq!

User avatar
onemac
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 7:09 pm

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by onemac » Sun Feb 08, 2015 12:56 pm

All valid opinions above but the original post was not a log and if the second poster had not confirmed then there would have been no tie-up. It would therefore appear that as long as all the boxes are ticked somewhere along the thread then it becomes valid which in turn means the original post wasn't. Each to their own I suppose.

Al

Zymurgy661
Posts: 3308
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:15 am

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by Zymurgy661 » Sun Feb 08, 2015 1:24 pm

But isn't that what forums are about ? Sharing of information that is available and, if others have information to help improve on that then even better. There are no defined rules on what constitutes a log and the info posted clearly logs a historical movement at the base. For me, its fine as it is but other may not agree - each to their own as you say!

Zymurgy661
Posts: 3308
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:15 am

Re: A400 Atlas spotted

Post by Zymurgy661 » Sun Feb 08, 2015 7:47 pm

Just because the original thread was locked does not mean that the discussion can just continue in another.

Thread locked.

Locked

Return to “South West England”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests