Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

Sigma 60-600mm?

Post your questions, reviews and technical issues here.
Post Reply
GVLCN
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:15 pm
Location: cardiff

Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by GVLCN » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:07 pm

Hi all,

Looking at getting this lens as I’ve read it’s much better than the 150-600mm! I currently have the contemporary version of this lens, have noticed that it is soft at 600mm so I try not to use it at full reach.

However have read that the 60-600mm is sharp at 600mm, has anyone had any experience with this lens or could help me out with advice?

Thanks Andy

MRTT
Posts: 6246
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by MRTT » Sat Oct 12, 2019 5:26 pm

Considering a purchase too, not cheap, that's for sure!

Having read a few reviews, it certainly seems much sharper than the 150-600mm.

User avatar
Richard B
Moderator
Posts: 4718
Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 3:53 pm
Location: Warwickshire

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by Richard B » Sat Oct 12, 2019 7:34 pm

Looking at getting one myself, still have an old 50-500 that's still going strong after 15 years of abusive use.
Been through many rain storms, sleet ,snow, frost and dropped from a 6ft tree stump down a ditch.
Gets baked sometimes in the summer months.
Not sure if the new Bigma 60-600 as the gold ring like the old one does.
The gold ring on the sigma's was I'm told the same like code as Canon use for there L glass lens with the Red ring.

Quick edit, looking up on things, Sigma have dropped the EX gold ring pro glass and now use
C, contemporary
S,sport
A, art

Weazel69
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:51 am
Location: North Norfolk

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by Weazel69 » Sat Oct 12, 2019 8:43 pm

well as a guy who bit the bullet so to speak, I have one and really like it. I use a Canon 5D III and in the past used the Canon 100/400 with a 1.4 convertor which I could not get on with so went for a Sigma 150/600S,but the weight was a bit of a draw back especially on windy days.then when Sigma said they were bringing out the 60/600 I was up for it, so when it came out I was over to WEX and when the staff handed over the lens it was like wow, its lighter its shorter and feels more balanced than the 150/600
and then theres this shake reducing on it so you can hand hold easier in windy conditions
Having got it last Oct/Nov when they first came out I can say now having had it a year I am really Happy with it

also to add that I use a Full Frame camera, the 60mm end is far better for the biggies like for example the C5s/B747s ect
forewarned is forearmed

GVLCN
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:15 pm
Location: cardiff

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by GVLCN » Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:33 pm

Thanks that’s great info, I did have the 100-400mm mk 2 but 400mm just isn’t enough reach on a full frame sensor!
Weazel69 would you say it’s sharper that the 150-600mm? Also did you have the 100-400mm mk 2 before switching?

Many thanks Andy

Weazel69
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:51 am
Location: North Norfolk

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by Weazel69 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:20 am

the answer to the 100/400 is yes I had both, the mk.II was an improvement on autofocus. but as you rightly say the focal lenght is a bit short for some shooting hence the 1.4 lens convertor, but I would not go down that road again. As for the sharper question I would say yes because of the weight and the stabilsor makes it easier to operate
my suggestion on that one is either find someone who has one, and get to feel the grips of it or go to a store and feel the weight as I am sure that like myself you will feel the difference straight away, I have to say that I feel that the aurofocus on the 60/600 is an improvement. All in all I feel this is a good lens :thumbs:
Not being disrespective but I also noted comment on price, well I feel this lens is good value for money when you look at what Canons 400 & 600 prime lens's are :grr:
reading the initial post I note you mention that you have the 150/600c well I had the s version which is heavier, but you will find that the 60/600 is currently only in the s version and when it comes to weight comparisons it comes between both or A its lighter & shorter than the 150/600s but B its heavier than the 150/600c
forewarned is forearmed

GVLCN
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:15 pm
Location: cardiff

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by GVLCN » Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:57 am

Thanks that’s been very helpful, I was tempted to buy a 100-400mm mk 2 again and buy a converter just because I loved the lens.
Photos with my current lens are great but the hunting on af is quite annoying sometimes & I do feel it could be a little sharper. You’ve definitely sold it to me 😀 the extra length in zoom will also mean I won’t have to switch between lenses & keep missing potentially great shots. Especially of the bigger aircraft.

ghostwave525
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:11 pm

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by ghostwave525 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:18 pm

is there really a need? your gonna spend thousands on this lens just because it's sharper if you want sharper images stop it down to around F7.1 OR F8 and if it's still soft for you then just use Photoshop. your not gonna use 600mm very much, i have a 70-300 L IS and that gets the trick done 95% of the time. Don't go around buying a punch of lenses it really doesn't matter learn your camera and lens and learn lightroom and Photoshop and i think you'll be fine. the guys who spend ridiculous amounts of money on lenses are often the worst photographers cause they think the equipment is what's gonna make them a good photographer.

GVLCN
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:15 pm
Location: cardiff

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by GVLCN » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:05 pm

Thanks for your input but I know how to take a photograph & I always shoot manual, to me I was always told it’s the glass on the front that counts!

I do edit very little as I’m very fussy with my photos, I know most people will quite happily polish a turd 😄 but if I can’t make out the pilots name & the no step signs then it goes straight in the bin.

ghostwave525
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 2:11 pm

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by ghostwave525 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:41 pm

GVLCN wrote:
Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:05 pm
Thanks for your input but I know how to take a photograph & I always shoot manual, to me I was always told it’s the glass on the front that counts!

I do edit very little as I’m very fussy with my photos, I know most people will quite happily polish a turd 😄 but if I can’t make out the pilots name & the no step signs then it goes straight in the bin.
i agree with the glass infront of the camera is what counts but you've already got a nice lens. it's clearly you choice and if you think that's what's necessary to make your images go up a level then go for it but it's alot of money just for sharpness and i don't want you to regret it later on. i have also had that lens but i didn't get rid of it for 1 reason there was a multitude of reasons such as weight, not being able to go lower than 150mm, the minimum F-stop (F5) and also like you said the sharpness. Anyway if you do get it i hope you enjoy it.

GVLCN
Posts: 890
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 5:15 pm
Location: cardiff

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by GVLCN » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:54 pm

Yeah thanks I’ll have a good think about it, like you say is a lot of money for what might be a little bit sharper!

Will have a look at a few more reviews, ideally I’ll try one out & go from there!
Thanks for the info guys

Weazel69
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2017 5:51 am
Location: North Norfolk

Re: Sigma 60-600mm?

Post by Weazel69 » Mon Dec 02, 2019 12:00 pm

Hi GVLCN just as a matter of interest how have you got on?? Did you bite the bullet and make the purchase?? or are you waiting that ol' bearded phella - aka - F.Christmas
forewarned is forearmed

Post Reply

Return to “Photography Q & A / How to post photos”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests