1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

More at https://www.flickr.com/photos/65425040@N07/
Hope you enjoyed them?
Great post Michael - I'd have been very ,very pleased even to have seen these let alone photograph them!chek16 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:02 pmHi Michael, great to see some Phantoms in the air!
If it helps, I have a photo from the Airfighters site of 69-7286 landing at Lakenheath that's dated October 1994.
I very much doubt the Nellis Weasels would have deployed via Lakenheath very often, so would guess that's the likely date fort your photos too.
I thank you both for the information that you submitted to the post, really great that you guys still have your 'BAR' records and have been able to date my photographsgraham luxton wrote: ↑Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:37 amGreat post Michael - I'd have been very ,very pleased even to have seen these let alone photograph them!chek16 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 24, 2019 10:02 pmHi Michael, great to see some Phantoms in the air!
If it helps, I have a photo from the Airfighters site of 69-7286 landing at Lakenheath that's dated October 1994.
I very much doubt the Nellis Weasels would have deployed via Lakenheath very often, so would guess that's the likely date fort your photos too.
Spot on with the month/year Chek - but it was actually on the 5/6th Oct'94 according to `BAR`. The C-130 arrived from Lajes on the 4th and departed back there on the 6th.
The F-4 movements were complicated but`BAR`worked them out! On the 5th Oct, 6 WA's arrived from the Middle East - those in the photo's plus 69-0278. On the 6th, 4 departed to
the US leaving 69-0278 and 69-0286 behind. On the 12th Oct, 10 WA's, including 4 which had returned to the states on the 6th, arrived from Nellis going to the Middle East. Included in those was 69-7286, which meant that there were 2 WA's present at Lakenheath whose tail numbers ended with "286" On the 17th Oct, 10 of these departed to the middle East leaving the 2, 286's behind. These remained until the 27th Oct but returned to the US instead, causing some amusement apparently by those that saw them go due to them having the same last 3.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests