Page 1 of 1

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 3:10 am
by Supra
Much better on the 'exposure' front, but some of the H-60 shots have the background 'squinting' bright to bring-out the Helo' detail. All props & rotors have way too high shutter-speed resulting in near static blades. Osprey is a pig to get rotor blur without high binning-rate, but you could slow them slightly?
Not bad for a novice!! ;)

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:56 am
by paddyboy
Hi PH

Always like to peek at your shots, even if the locations and weather generally get me green-eyed :lol:

Osprey pics are real standouts for me :thumb:

Best regards

Paddyboy :clap:

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:04 am
by Jason407
Pig Hunter. If your skills are only meager then I'm going to give up taking any pics right now. If my pics could come out as well as yours do I'd be pretty happy.

I think they're awesome mate, carry on please.

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:50 am
by 350biker
Please keep up the good work, ignore the arty farty comments. I dont need to know about the trees in the background - just the fine detail of the dark coloured helicopters!

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:20 am
by POL
pig hunter wrote:I do not understand the fascination with spinning props

I want a clear image of the serial
This section is devoted to photography. Ergo, you will find the majority of those that frequent it are more interested in well-taken photos, not "record shots".

I am, primarily, a number-collector, but I will quite quickly change my camera settings to get a record shot, in between taking decent photos. I accept this may be difficult in South America, but when you're at Montgomery, then I can't see it being as much of an issue?

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:55 am
by Ratrace
I always enjoy your post's, some more than others but like you say they're your photos so you post what you want to, no body is forcing any body to look at them.
Keep it up and thanks for sharing.

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:54 am
by Yammer
PH please keep posting your photos thanks. You post a wide variety of subjects in many faraway locations - all photos welcome - please post.

Perfect photos belong in the local camera club.

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:36 pm
by Yunglee
I like the set, especially the first one. Keep taking and sharing your photo's I like seeing them

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:01 pm
by Bushmasters
Hang in there ph. I have no clue about all the techo stuff but really enjoy seeing photo's from somewhere different & the variety that comes with it. :D

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2016 1:04 pm
by luke28
I like seeimg your subjects, something different that we don't see often.

However your 'everybody look at me' theatrical essays are quite embarrasing :thumbs:

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:31 am
by Supra
There are some good & valid comments regarding the difference between accomplished photography & grab-shots, serial checks & 'Sammy side-ons'! 'Ph' will be the person to snatch a rarity from a moving airliner that could ordinarily lead to a lengthy stretch of free-board accommodation & picking-up soap! Nobody can argue that a record shot of a unique airframe is beyond worrying about settings. My point is that the serial is evident in the first Osprey shot. Therefore having time & a safe environment at MGM (assuming it's not Deliverance territory?) perhaps the following 4 samey shots posted might contain some variance in the settings on the new 'top of the shop' kit recently purchased.
The AC-130 appears to be the same shot in both cases, right down to the prop' blade positions!! I used to have an Airfix C-130 that hung from my bedroom ceiling, naturally it wasn't really flying coz the props were stopped. :whistle:

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:25 am
by sandy11
I really enjoy and appreciate you taking the time and effort to post your great photos, long may it continue and thank you.

Sandy

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 3:29 pm
by Mark43
Jesus this world is full of moaning Mary's. I like your pics PH once I had worked out where MGM was :D

So what if they aren't perfect all the time. They are all good enough to recognise the aircraft and that's fine with me.

Middle finger to all the discontenters.

Re: MGM 8 February 16

Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:19 pm
by filmman
Love you high quality pictures.
I use a 36MP resolution camera and prime lenses for high quality, set exposures manually to achieve optimum exposure. None of my lenses have image stabilisation and only one has auto focus. Recently a professional photographer said that because of higher camera resolution the old rule of 1 over focal length needed to be doubled, ie 300mm lens needed a minimum exposure of 1/600, personally I use 1/1000. I set a high standard for results; aiming to read the smallest fuselage text, consequently prop blur is of no importance.
Keep posting quality, best wishes