Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
vintage
Re: vintage
To much blur added to the 1st shot, the wheels are static with no motion at all. Looks like a stationary car with too much background blur.
Does not work for me.
Does not work for me.
Re: vintage
Sorry!... doesn't work for me.
In the first image it appears to be 'flying', the static wheels don't help & the drivers' face would be spread back around his ears at the speed of blur! (& it's a nasty 'Q-plate' replica )
Can't see the second one as anything but a car falling off a multi-storey car-park
If you can get a shot of the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang replica car that exists, then apply your 1st shot PP.... that could work well?
In the first image it appears to be 'flying', the static wheels don't help & the drivers' face would be spread back around his ears at the speed of blur! (& it's a nasty 'Q-plate' replica )
Can't see the second one as anything but a car falling off a multi-storey car-park
If you can get a shot of the Chitty Chitty Bang Bang replica car that exists, then apply your 1st shot PP.... that could work well?
Re: vintage
I prefer the first to the second. Take your time with masking the car to avoid the straight lines on the wheels, which make look a bit jagged and unnatural to me. You can apply a radial blur to the wheels which will do the motion blur, but in a circular direction. On the whole I'd tone the motion blur down a notch too to make things look a little bit more 'real' and remove some of the effects that make it look like the motion blur is 'leaking' into the back of the car.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests