Boeing will miss 2017 delivery goal for first KC-46
By: Valerie Insinna and Aaron Mehta
Defense News
December 2, 2017
SIMI VALLEY, Calif. — Boeing will miss its self-imposed goal to deliver the first KC-46 tanker to the Air Force by the end of the year, the head of the company’s defense business told Defense News in an exclusive interview.
“We’re not going to be delivering a tanker this year,” Leanne Caret, president and CEO of Boeing Defense and Security, said Saturday on the sidelines of the Reagan National Defense Forum.
“This has been a focus of mine since I’ve taken over this role. The team has been persistent, they have a lot of grit, they’re continuing to drive it,” she said. “We are extremely close, we will be delivering those [aircraft] in 2018 and there is no doubt in my mind that this is a great franchise for the Boeing Company and we are delivering an incredible capability to the United States Air Force and to the world.”
Boeing is contractually required to deliver 18 certified KC-46s and nine refueling pods by October 2018 or face additional penalties, but is not bound by the terms of its fixed-price contract with the Air Force to hand over the first aircraft by a certain date.
As such, the company will not be subject to a fee — a minor point of consolation for Boeing, which has already had to pay $2.9 billion pre-tax, or about $1.9 billion after tax, because of the numerous cost overruns and delays associated with the program.
Boeing has already missed its original deadline in August 2017 to deliver the first 18 KC-46s and first delivery has also slipped a couple times since then.
Lt. Gen. Arnold Bunch, the Air Force’s uniformed head of acquisition, said the service has been made aware that Boeing will not be able to deliver the first tanker until 2018.
“We’ve said all along that we thought it would be later than what they have been predicting, but the point on it is that Boeing is still very committed to the program,” he added. “They are a great partner, they are definitely committed and are throwing resources at the program to get it to go forward, and we’re doing everything we can to provide the resources to make them successful at getting it done as quickly as they can.”
Bunch said the Air Force had expected to accept the first KC-46 in March, but now “we think it may be a little later than that,” he said.
The Air Force plans to purchase 179 KC-46s during its program of record and Boeing is hoping to rake in international sales once the program moves out of the test phase.
While Boeing still has a considerable amount of testing required before it can deliver a certified KC-46, the company is also facing challenges in resolving several category-one deficiencies that cropped up this year.
The Air Force has resolved one issue, which occurred when the flow of fuel suddenly stops, causing the KC-46 boom to push forward into the receptacle of the receiving aircraft.
“We’ve worked through the engineering and we’ve done the systems engineering analysis and that one is solved,” Bunch said.
Another problem — which involved ensuring that the high-frequency radio remains off during refueling, even during a systems failure — is slated to be resolved “reasonably quickly” after further testing, he said.
However, the Air Force has still not been able to identify the root cause of why the boom seems to be scraping the receiving aircraft during a refueling, and more testing needs to be done to determine whether the problem is occurring more with the KC-46 than with legacy tankers.
“We’re trying to observe and collect data,” Bunch said. “All of that engineering analysis and those data collections from flight, and all of that, is still something the team is working on.”
Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
KC-46 Deliverys slip again.
A forum for discussing all things related to MILITARY AVIATION including Military Aviation news. No off-topic discussions here please.
- eagle driver
- Posts: 13384
- Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:46 am
- Location: knaphill Surrey
- Contact:
Return to “The Fighter Control Mess”
Jump to
- ↳ Highlights of the Week
- ↳ Seasonal Photo Challenge
- ↳ Photo Challenge - Autumn 2011
- ↳ Photo Challenge - Winter 2011
- ↳ Photo Challenge - Spring 2012
- Fighter Control Information
- ↳ Forum Rules
- ↳ Fighter Control and Forum Technical Information
- ↳ AeroResource Articles
- ↳ The Newbie Forum
- Fighter Control Community
- ↳ The Fighter Control Mess
- ↳ Military Aviation Memorabilia
- Military Aviation Photography
- ↳ Photography Section Rules and Guidelines
- ↳ Military Aviation Photo Competitions
- ↳ Monthly Photo Competition
- ↳ Specialist Photo Competitions
- ↳ Current Military Photography
- ↳ Airshow & Event Photography
- ↳ Warbirds, Replicas and Nostalgic Photography
- ↳ Aviation Videography
- ↳ Photography Q & A / How to post photos
- Airshows
- ↳ UK Airshows
- ↳ RIAT
- ↳ Farnborough
- ↳ Duxford Shows
- ↳ Yeovilton
- ↳ Cosford
- ↳ Other Airshows & Events
- ↳ Archived Airshows
- ↳ Leuchars
- ↳ Scampton
- ↳ Waddington
- ↳ Shuttleworth
- ↳ European Airshows
- ↳ Rest of the World Airshows
- Spotters Area - Serials and Airfield Logs
- ↳ Recent Serial tie up area
- ↳ Old Serial tie up area
- ↳ South West England
- ↳ RMB Chivenor
- ↳ RNAS Culdrose & Predannack
- ↳ MoD Boscombe Down
- ↳ RAF St Mawgan & Newquay
- ↳ RNAS Yeovilton, Yeovil Westlands & Merryfield
- ↳ Southern England
- ↳ AAC Middle Wallop
- ↳ RAF Benson
- ↳ RAF Brize Norton
- ↳ RAF Fairford
- ↳ Archive Movements 2009 - Present
- ↳ RAF Northolt
- ↳ RAF Odiham
- ↳ West England & Wales
- ↳ RAF Valley & Mona
- ↳ DSAE Cosford
- ↳ RAF Shawbury & Ternhill
- ↳ MOD St Athan
- ↳ Cardiff
- ↳ Lincolnshire, The Midlands & Rutland
- ↳ RAF Coningsby
- ↳ RAF Cranwell & Barkston Heath
- ↳ RAF Waddington
- ↳ RAF Scampton
- ↳ RAF Wittering & Cottesmore
- ↳ East Anglia
- ↳ RAF Wyton
- ↳ Stansted
- ↳ Cambridge Airport
- ↳ AAC Wattisham
- ↳ RAF Lakenheath
- ↳ RAF Mildenhall
- ↳ RAF Marham
- ↳ Northern England
- ↳ BAE Brough
- ↳ RAF Leeming
- ↳ RAF Linton-on-Ouse
- ↳ Warton Aerodrome
- ↳ BAE Woodford
- ↳ Scotland and Ireland
- ↳ RAF Kinloss
- ↳ RAF Leuchars
- ↳ RAF Lossiemouth
- ↳ Prestwick
- ↳ Edinburgh
- ↳ Baldonnel
- ↳ JHC Aldergrove
- ↳ Dublin
- ↳ Shannon
- ↳ All other areas around the UK
- ↳ Europe
- ↳ Germany
- ↳ Other Areas
- ↳ Netherlands
- ↳ Belgium
- ↳ Italy, Malta & Mainland Greece
- ↳ Cyprus & Crete
- ↳ Spain & Portugal
- ↳ Denmark and Norway
- ↳ France
- ↳ North America and the Rest of the World
- ↳ United States of America
- ↳ Canada
- ↳ Rest of the World
- Military Ranges
- ↳ RAF and RN Weapon Ranges
- ↳ Aberporth Range
- ↳ Castlemartin & Manorbier
- ↳ Pembrey Range
- ↳ Donna Nook Range
- ↳ Holbeach Range
- ↳ Wainfleet Range
- ↳ Tain Range
- ↳ Garvie Island
- ↳ Spadeadam & SPACES
- ↳ Lilstock Range
- ↳ Muckleburgh, Sculthorpe & STANTA
- ↳ Sennybridge
- Military Aircraft Flight Simulation
- ↳ Flight Simulator
- ↳ Flight Simulation General Chat
- ↳ FS2004 and FSX Addon Updates
- ↳ FS9 and FSX Repaints
- ↳ Flight Simulator Technical Board
- Heritage, Demobbed & Preservation Groups
- ↳ Newark Air Museum (NAM)
- ↳ Heritage Area
- ↳ RAF Lyneham
- ↳ AAC Dishforth
- ↳ RAF Boulmer
- ↳ RAF Church Fenton & RAF Topcliffe
- ↳ Leconfield
- ↳ The Vulcan XH558 Forum
- Military Aircraft Modelling
- ↳ Modelling Community
- ↳ Technical - Tools and Tips/Walkrounds
- ↳ Work In Progress
- ↳ Gallery
- ↳ FC Modelling Competition
- ↳ Finished Builds
- ↳ Group Builds
- Fighter Control General
- ↳ General Chat
- ↳ General Photography
- Website Promotion & For Sale/Wanted
- ↳ Promotion of your website
- ↳ For Sale and Wanted
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests