Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....
Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Now that's what I call a post ! Only ever saw one up at the Finningley Battle of Britain display in '72 I believe. My first trip to the 'Heath they were up and running on F-4D.
Brilliant pics. thanks very much for posting
3Greens
Brilliant pics. thanks very much for posting
3Greens
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
The Finningley F-100D was 1971 (56-3204)
Steve
Steve
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Amazing post, thanks for sharing.
-
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:27 pm
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Great post, remember it well - March - Aug'71. 40+ F-100's made the move making the south west area of the base 'Hun heaven! More F-100's boltholed to Wethersfield.
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
My top of topic that
My completed model builds......http://www.flickr.com/photos/52328347@N02/sets/
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Interestingly they have their O- for obsolete tail serials just like some B-58 Hustlers I saw in a photo recently.
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Brilliant post & great scans & rare.
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Huntastic post
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Stunning jet & pics - thank you.
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Now that is what I call a post
Superb pics of a real beast
Thanks for sharing
Best regards
Paddyboy
Superb pics of a real beast
Thanks for sharing
Best regards
Paddyboy
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Superb post . Would have loved to have seen these flying .
Thanks for posting
Mike
Thanks for posting
Mike
- Arthur Tee
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 12:51 pm
- Location: Shawbury, Shrewsbury,Shropshire!
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Fantastic scans from a fantastic era!
Is picture number 2 from a different location? The hangars in the background don't look like any of those at the Hall...
Arthur
Is picture number 2 from a different location? The hangars in the background don't look like any of those at the Hall...
Arthur
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
I can't remember these but can remember the Danish jets at Binbrook in the early 80s and the FS jet at the last airshow in 87.
Can anyone remember the F-105s at Sculthorpe in 1978
And cool pics by the way.
Tim S
Can anyone remember the F-105s at Sculthorpe in 1978
And cool pics by the way.
Tim S
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Most certainly can Tim, ANG F105's (16th June'78) had the bonus at Sculthorpe of the remaining T33's, Mystere's and F100's retired out of the French AF.
Got the Danish F100's at Binbrook (17th Oct '78)
Got the Danish F100's at Binbrook (17th Oct '78)
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Missed these shots.
Simply stunning.
I was 15 when the Danish where at Binbrook in 1978, could not afford a camera then but these shots bring it all back.
Thanks for posting.
Andy
Simply stunning.
I was 15 when the Danish where at Binbrook in 1978, could not afford a camera then but these shots bring it all back.
Thanks for posting.
Andy
“Live in the sunshine, swim the sea, drink the wild air.”
Re: Huns at the Hall, early Seventies
Brilliant post, fantastic photos
In the 1950s, many airplanes left over from the World War II era were still in service, exceeding their expected service lives of less than 10 years. In order to avoid potential confusion with later aircraft given the same tail number, these older aircraft had the number zero and a dash added in front of the tail number to indicate that they were over 10 years old. It was hoped that this would avoid confusion caused by duplication of tail numbers between two aircraft built over ten years apart. However, this was not always done, and it was not always possible uniquely to identify an aircraft by a knowledge of its tail number. This practice was eventually discontinued when people started referring to the number 0 as being a letter O, standing for Obsolete. The requirement for the 0- prefix was officially dropped on April 24, 1972.
100% wrong, it is 0 (zero) for starters, not the letter 'O'!! Please see below for the correct explanation of the '0-' that appeared in front of the serial of some USAF aircraft in the 50's, 60's and 70's.quid21 wrote:Interestingly they have their O- for obsolete tail serials just like some B-58 Hustlers I saw in a photo recently.
In the 1950s, many airplanes left over from the World War II era were still in service, exceeding their expected service lives of less than 10 years. In order to avoid potential confusion with later aircraft given the same tail number, these older aircraft had the number zero and a dash added in front of the tail number to indicate that they were over 10 years old. It was hoped that this would avoid confusion caused by duplication of tail numbers between two aircraft built over ten years apart. However, this was not always done, and it was not always possible uniquely to identify an aircraft by a knowledge of its tail number. This practice was eventually discontinued when people started referring to the number 0 as being a letter O, standing for Obsolete. The requirement for the 0- prefix was officially dropped on April 24, 1972.
Survival of the Fittest.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 34 guests