Did you know that registration to Fighter Control is completely free and brings you lots of added features? Find out more....

US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Only modern military and government aviation can be posted in this section.
Post Reply
User avatar
Macclad51
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:36 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Macclad51 » Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:55 pm

What a difference a week makes!!

Image15-01584 by Steven Sutcliffe, on Flickr
1st photo 15-01584 landing at Mildenhall last weekend

Image15-01584_2 by Steven Sutcliffe, on Flickr
2nd photo same aircraft landing today. I couldn't help notice the difference in antenna locations. Upper VHF and Satcom antennas are further forward on the upper photo. There is an extra HF wire antenna on the second shot and the two small antennas forward of the VHF antenna have disappeared on the 2nd shot. There is also a change to the antenna to the right of the dorsal fin (by the serial) on both aircraft.

Quite a bit of work has been carried out in the week it was away, or is it the same aircraft that went west last week???
Last edited by Macclad51 on Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:15 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
SamP
Administrator
Posts: 6747
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Near Gatwick Airport, UK

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by SamP » Sat Apr 21, 2018 11:35 pm

Incredibly interesting to see such a difference so soon after it went westbound. I thought it unusual for it to head back east just a week later anyway!

Does anyone know where this went, destination wise after Keflavik last week?

Punkrunner62
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 3:55 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Punkrunner62 » Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:44 am

Quick change artist?,nice shots.
Cheers.

slogen51
Moderator
Posts: 49502
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:11 am
Location: Norfolk - Mundford - YG-BSM

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by slogen51 » Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:59 am

Even the painting of the serial looks different to me

Bucky P
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:43 am
Location: Oxfordshire UK.

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Bucky P » Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:45 am

I would say the cheat lines where they end on the nose are different too! The first shot appears to show they curve down at the end while in the second shot they appear straight! :ninja:

User avatar
paddyboy
Posts: 23738
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:32 pm
Location: Somewhere in Norfolk

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by paddyboy » Sun Apr 22, 2018 7:53 am

Nice shots, Steven :thumbs:

Thanks for posting :thumb:

Paddyboy :clap:
XH558, always the first lady in my life
Just remember, please don't tell the wife


Image
GRIM REAPERS SUPPORTER

POL
Posts: 16731
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by POL » Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:36 am

SamP wrote:Incredibly interesting to see such a difference so soon after it went eastbound. I thought it unusual for it to head back west just a week later anyway.

Does anyone know where this went, destination wise after Keflavik last week?
Makes you wonder if it's the same airframe...

User avatar
Freeman Lowell
Posts: 1302
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 8:00 pm
Location: Blandford Forum, occasionally

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Freeman Lowell » Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:36 am

Main wheel centre boss, amount of black paint on main undercarriage doors, point at which the cheat lines cross the nose avionics cooling vent. How many differences are we looking for?
Freeman
Sometimes I talk to myself, then we both laugh and laugh.

Bucky P
Posts: 854
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:43 am
Location: Oxfordshire UK.

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Bucky P » Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:41 am

Nobody else has actually said it yet but I think it's a different aircraft! :thumbs:

AK01
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 7:50 am

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by AK01 » Sun Apr 22, 2018 8:57 am

Checked the ADSB data, this arrived at Ft Bragg on the 17th around 20.30Z. Next plot was on the 18th at 00.08Z.
So only 4 hours to modify this aircraft before departing back en-route to Iceland.......

Some further info. N71885 (hex A99D53) is registered to Powel and Simpson LLC.
They have 3 other Beeches registered in the FAA register, for all three i can't find any actual sightings or pictures.
The four are : N73380 (FL-480) hex A9D989, N37084 (FL-482) hex A43758 and N36988 (FL-488) hex A4314C.
Pieter,

User avatar
BOLLO
Posts: 95825
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:22 pm
Location: Nottingham/Mildenhall.

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by BOLLO » Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:15 am

Looks very much the same as it did when he passed through last year ..

ImageUS-Army-C-12-15-01584-R5158 by Paul Callaghan, on Flickr
http://www.airfighters.com/photosearch.php?phgid=SHED" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; LOADES
http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.s ... _entry=140+" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; at last

What do cry when we see The Man With the Stick???

User avatar
eagle driver
Posts: 13459
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:46 am
Location: knaphill Surrey
Contact:

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by eagle driver » Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:32 am

Bucky P wrote:Nobody else has actually said it yet but I think it's a different aircraft! :thumbs:
Just had a look at these two photos on the big screen here at home and unless they can respray a aircraft while fitting the aerials in as had been said 4 hours then its two different aircraft.

User avatar
SamP
Administrator
Posts: 6747
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Near Gatwick Airport, UK

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by SamP » Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:54 am

Freeman Lowell wrote:Main wheel centre boss, amount of black paint on main undercarriage doors, point at which the cheat lines cross the nose avionics cooling vent. How many differences are we looking for?
Freeman

I'm convinced this is a different aircraft now. On closer inspection, the differences detailed above are irrefutable. The most obvious as solgen has already pointed out is actually the serial itself. The gap between the end of the wavy lines on the tailplane and the start of the serial is about 4x wider on the aircraft that went through yesterday compared to the the aircraft that went through last weekend. To compensate for this, the font and text size on the latter aircraft are smaller allowing it to fit further forward on the leading edge flaring of the fin ahead of the new blade antenna.

Plus, 4 hours on the deck at Ft Bragg to facilitate all these changes is just not possible!

POL
Posts: 16731
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by POL » Sun Apr 22, 2018 9:03 pm

Take a look at the vent on the nose, the wavy lines are totally different.

Will be interesting to compare Bollo's photo with the two above...

User avatar
f106dart
Posts: 533
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:20 am

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by f106dart » Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:38 pm

EGVP wrote:Take a look at the vent on the nose, the wavy lines are totally different.

Will be interesting to compare Bollo's photo with the two above...
Differnt side of the AC

User avatar
Macclad51
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:36 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Re: US Army C12 at Mildenhall

Post by Macclad51 » Sun Apr 22, 2018 10:39 pm

Thanks for all the comments. I too was convinced these were two different airframes, just wanted to throw it out there.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Post Reply

Return to “Current Military Photography”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sea mosquito, Seamus, sjoerd, Sussexlad, thevulcan and 100 guests